Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Nao
9496
Plugins / Re: Plugin hooks
« on April 1st, 2011, 07:56 PM »
Pete, what about the template hooks I discussed earlier?
9497
Other software / [Flames] Re: Dream Portal
« on April 1st, 2011, 07:54 PM »
Quote from Xarcell on April 1st, 2011, 07:47 PM
You didn't answer my question. Why Fork it instead trying to be a part of the DP team and make it better?
Because DP is for SMF. And we have nothing to give to SMF. I stopped working on Aeva Media because I didn't want SMF to gain indirectly from my work. All of my efforts are on Wedge. I think it's pretty much the same for Pete, at least for big projects that he didn't create himself.

DP on Wedge would require a rewrite for a lot of areas. There's no point in maintaining both versions in parallel. We'd just fork it, not as a "DP for Wedge", but as a *part* of Wedge.

Anyway-- we gave up on that, remember?

texasman, no arrangements. The owner of portaMx made quite an impression here (let's just say she made a fool out of herself...), DP is a no-no, and as for TinyPortal, it's up to Bloc (and I think he's given up on it, although you'd best ask him.)
SimplePortal, I have no idea but I don't think the license would allow for anything anyway.
9498
Other software / Re: SMF 2.0 Gold is released!!!!
« on April 1st, 2011, 07:40 PM »
Just one word to know: rickrollear = rickrolling.
9499
Plugins / Re: Plugin hooks
« on April 1st, 2011, 07:35 PM »
@Dragooon> But you never actually asked for Consultant status...?
Quote from texasman1979 on April 1st, 2011, 05:09 PM
man i love you and arantor, yall are the coolest Europeans i know. :)
Out of 350 million? I think it's just luck :p
Quote
I'm unlike most anyone you have ever met, American or not.
Well I've met my share of unusual people... The most unusual probably being me :P
Quote
I started programming with a TI-81 calculator. When i went to college in 2002, I had never seen the internet but a few times. Since then, however, i have embraced it, almost completely, in one form or another. I have 6 computers, 3 vps's, and 4 domain names.
I have, err.... one computer. And zero VPS. Do my 30+ domain names count? ;)
Quote
What I am expressing in past posts is not theory or an example of practice. It is merely raw logic from more than half a year of customizing my own version of SMF, at the same time you were.
I customized noisen.com for several years too -- little did I know that it would be MUCH harder to actually turn it into a usable generic forum package. Oh my... And I'm not even done.
Quote
It may not appear so at times, but i come with only good tidings and my best advice/input that i can come up with.
I'd like to make it mandatory for everyone to post a blurb about themselves before posting in these boards, but I don't like enforcing rules... I believe in freedom, but sometimes it's hard to get along with everyone when they just come, post what they have to post, and leave. See what I mean?
9500
Other software / [Flames] Re: Dream Portal
« on April 1st, 2011, 07:27 PM »
- No mods will work. Absolutely none. Zero.
- All mods will be upgradeable to work with Wedge. Some will require some work, others will require a complete rewrite.
- We won't upgrade these mods ourselves.
- However, if we find them interesting, and the mod author asks for help, we'll try to help.

SMF's current mod system is flawed enough that it can be seen as one of its major drawbacks. So we needed to go through that anyway.
Plus, it ensures we don't have to bother about mod compatibility when we do complete rewrites of some areas.
9501
Other software / Re: So, I've been asked...
« on April 1st, 2011, 07:22 PM »
Quote from texasman1979 on April 1st, 2011, 06:02 PM
always remember tho, spite begets spite. forget about anger, roll with the punches. continue forward. dont think about smf, think about wedge.
That's exactly why we kept so quiet about Wedge for 7 months... We spent the time working on it. I didn't create an alternative account or anything at sm.org, I simply stopped caring about it, and was focusing on Wedge.
I know that confronting an audience has never been my forte, and it tends to degenerate quickly into flame wars. This is one of the reasons why we weren't sure whether to go public or not. Especially because we knew that most of the fights tend to start as soon as something changes. i.e. in this case, going public would bring its lot, and it would calm down afterwards. So I'm discussing the things that are in the air, establishing my position, and hopefully people won't come again with the same complaints in the future.

tl:dr
Flame wars are unavoidable here, in this day of going public. What matters is that it settles soon. But, of course, the SMF team had to plunge right into it... -_-
9502
Off-topic / Re: At cross ends...
« on April 1st, 2011, 05:46 PM »
Quote from Bloc on April 1st, 2011, 05:33 PM
Today I am torn between what I LIKE to do and what I am doing now. I have an overwhelming urge to tip everything SMF overboard and start using Wedge exclusively.
8-)
Quote
The bits Nao and Arantor have shown so far, on how templates work, convinced me that Wedge is becoming every bit SMF should have been. And SMF is going nowhere, SMF theme community is going nowhere as well. Thats a FACT.
Yes it is. Thank you for pointing it out. :)
Quote
Problem is - I can't yet can I? Use Wedge on Blocweb I mean, and start developing themes for it? License changes and all that?
I'm... afraid it's a bit complicated, yes.
Technically, any member of our team (and you're definitely a teamie!) can use Wedge on their website -- it's not redistribution, because it's within the team, all done privately. I can lend you my DVDs, no one can accuse you of pirating them. The only issue is with our demo site -- it's not something we want to reveal right now. First we'll start with screenshots, then the demo site, then the actual alpha version. Having Wedge used officially somewhere would disrupt these plans, although I suspect that Pete would appreciate being able to use it on Innovatenotimitate as well. (I'll be left unable to run it because it's still missing AeMe and other things I need, but that's not a problem except for my over-inflated ego :niark:)

When it comes to the legality of having a live website running Wedge, I'm not in the best position to answer. The current SVN of Wedge gives full credit to SMF in the footer, so I suspect it's legal to use it, as long as you don't distribute it. Which brings us to developing themes -- you would have to wait until SMF goes gold before you can actually distribute those themes.
Quote
Mind you, I'll prob. ditch SMF anyway, put up a WP blog in the meantime and await Wedge to be released. Nothing to lose anyway.
There are plenty of private topics here waiting for your feedback :)
Did you have a look at the Miscellany topic? I'm discussing blocks over there in the last page. Also, did you update to the latest SVN? Wine is in a state closer to final now (it may even be complete, I dunno.)
Plenty of things to look into!
9503
Other software / Re: So, I've been asked...
« on April 1st, 2011, 05:35 PM »
Quote from texasman1979 on April 1st, 2011, 04:16 PM
they know the fork and the developers behind it can and will given time take over as number one. the reason is that they are lazy and riding on the already found success of smf, and yall are screwing with their free ride. they feel that yall are trying as "newcomers" (i know this is BS but for the sake of argument) snatch it from them without earning it.
I don't think they do...
I've been in the SMF community for 5 years now, started doing community work in early 2008, and got thrown out in mid-2010 because I was fighting with vbLamer45 and he's under protection (I don't know why, but whatever.) They knew I was right about him, but they chose to kick me out instead of him -- because of the protection, and possibly because for the first time, someone was standing up to him and actually had the power and listeners to let the truth be known.
It's always been a battle of power. I just didn't realize it at the time. I re-read many PMs and discussions at the time, between the team and I, and it's quite clear that they knew they couldn't afford to lose me, one of their top contributors, and the reason why they were afraid of letting me into the team was that I was kind of a leader guy. I wouldn't have settled on a lowly position. And they probably knew that I was skilled enough to run the team and the development process at the same time. Thus, they knew that by kicking me out, either I would just drop SMF altogether and waste my time on something else, or, if I was to stay in the SMF community, I *would* go ahead and compete with them.
Heck, it doesn't take a genius to understand the politics behind all of this.
What matters here, is that they've had as much time as I had to understand said politics, and understand that they should take responsibility for their actions.
And they're doing exactly the same now as they did a year ago! You'd think they LEARNED wouldn't you...?
No, they haven't.

January 2010 split: they kicked out everyone who didn't agree with the power struggles. Ex-team went ahead and made their own forum. SMF bans everyone linking to the other forum. Ex-team builds new project, because SMF doesn't want to go BSD. SMF team realizes they're wrong, changes mind, announces BSD switch, ex-team leaves new project, goes back to fold. End of story.

August 2010: they kicked me out for challenging vbLamer45 in public. Arantor was also a victim of SMF's internal struggles at the time. We went ahead and started our own project. SMF team is made aware of it soon after, no word from them. I'm sure they thought we wouldn't last, like Jaelta... Wrong.

November 2010: we're still on it. Now, SMF team attacks me on technicalities. They remove my beta tester rights (which I was still using to make bug reports!), and my SMF Friend status (because for them, current politics trump overall recognition.) I try to make a compromise for them, after which they keep saying it's too late. So I cancel my compromise, and they threaten to sue (!!!). I say screw you. End of story. SMF loses their most active beta tester ever (400 reports or so), but I'm sure they'll see this as a victory...

March 2011: we go public. Arantor adds link in his signature. SMF team invents new rule to prevent him from doing it.

Who wants to bet they'll win this time? Who thinks they've learned their lessons and they'll come to their senses? Who thinks they'll finally acknowledge that their team is totally screwed up and they're making bad decision after bad decision?

Seriously, I don't even know why Pete keeps posting over there... They don't deserve a hundredth of the efforts he's making for SMF.
Quote
they know yall are the reason that smf 2.0 is what it is, they just wanted the credit for it.
Well I only on the actual source code for 2 months so I'm only responsible for parts of RC4's fixes, I'm not saying the other devs are bad, I'm just saying the men who turned SMF into fantastic software are long gone -- because of the politics. Because of the current team! So, no, we're not responsible for SMF2, we're however responsible for part of its success (me because of Aeva/SMG and Pete because of so many things I wouldn't know where to start.) As for taking our credit away... I don't know, I don't think the SMF community is that dumb.
Quote
your not better cause you work harder then they do, your better cause you are better.
I'm more of a guy who judges people by their actions, not their karma.
Quote
make a new logo especially for yalls posts on sm.org. make it represent where the software originally came from. make it a partnership of sorts.
A partnership? What do you want us to partner for? Especially with them? What do we owe them? We owe the current team absolutely nothing. They owe us. That's why they should acknowledge Wedge, instead of trying to hide it. They should declare they'll be looking forward to the competition. But they don't have the developers to follow suit. So their shortsightedness is currently losing them. They're making decisions for the near future, not for the far future. They don't know what they'll put into SMF3 because they all know they'll be gone before it even goes in beta.

....

....Well, all in all, that's what the SMF team management inspires me. Nothing but ill decisions and general lousiness.
Quote
-- alleviate the tension and make them feel that your not a direct competitor,
We tried that... Until the November backlash.
Quote
-- carrying their name with you in the beginning brings validity to wedge on the world stage. smf is established. wedge is not.
SMF is no longer established. It's dying, remember? More people are leaving the software than new people are joining it. It may also be true for other forum packages, I don't know, but the stats speak for themselves at sm.org.
And I don't want to build our software's reputation on SMF. Not on the *current* SMF.
(Besides, you know it's a public area and they're certainly reading all of this, right? Do you think they'd like you suggesting we "use" them for our benefit? ::))
Quote
they dont have to make their license where you can have wedge. they still have the power to screw you into next week. to make wedge what you want it to be, you going to have to put up with them, and appease them.
No, they have to, for several reasons we detailed elsewhere. In short: (1) they promised the community, and the community is tired of being screwed with. (2) SMF's ex-devs never signed any proper contracts and said they would relinquish the rights to their code ONLY if SMF went BSD... It's another struggle, but one that has been made public. So they HAVE to go BSD or they can't release SMF2 Gold *at all*. It's not a present they're giving us... It's the only way SMF can survive. (And it will survive -- through its forks, not through the core software.)
Quote
make a logo that includes them in it, and makes wedge a part of the bigger whole. that with some fancy words will make it where you can have your logo 100k strong on sm.org. but you cant slap them in the face. they will just squash you and force you to write your own software from the ground up. which it would be better to do that anyway, but....
When did putting a "Wedge. Simple math, really" logo amount to slapping someone in the face?

Do you realize that my initial slogan was "SMF for real men"? Now I would have understood they got upset at this slogan (which I came up with for fun, nothing else). But "Simple math"? Uh...
Quote
dont fight them, allow them to do whatever they wish to do. when the time is right, yall will just simply take first place, cause of their lack of work ethic.
Just by making these internal struggles public, we're already fighting them. Anyone at Wedge.org is now aware that SMF is not playing it nice. They've been presented with proof. That alone is enough for me.
9504
Plugins / Re: Plugin hooks
« on April 1st, 2011, 04:55 PM »
Quote from Dragooon on April 1st, 2011, 04:37 PM
XML(Or TOX for that matter) isn't more difficult to understand for programmers, it makes sense if you read it, seriously, give it a shot(10 minutes max), I'll give you some sample templates from my project if you want.
I already know ToxG's file structure, remember we discussed it several months ago already? At the time, everyone on the forum was excited at the idea of using ToxG for Wedge and I was quite alone saying I didn't see the point, then you guys spent a lot of time convincing me, I said okay as long as I'm not doing the conversion alone, Fustrate promised he'd convert one of the 'big templates' as an example, and then... Err... Well, said template never came, and the topic was buried ;)

Basically, what killed implementation is that it didn't have the ability to run ToxG templates alongside SMF templates (which would have been helpful because I keep modifying the templates so I couldn't stand stopping everything for several weeks), and/or no one stepped up to do the conversion work for me. I'm all for moving forward but I also have to draw the line sometimes -- there are only so many things I can do in a day. And my to-do-list is far from emptying itself faster than I can fill it up...
Quote
XML is a far more wide adaptation than PHP, more than that, it is easier to understand than PHP's syntax.
XML: <tpl:print="hello world" />
PHP: <?="hello world" ?>
Or something like that ;)
(Okay, I'm cheating with shortcuts but...)
Quote
Unknown's syntax is based on XML, but it is not strict XML per se. TOX-G uses a custom parser and not any standard parser(It doesn't even need the most basic XML plugins for PHP).
Yeah... They all suck anyway. Well, in my opinion. Do you remember when I built my CSS preparser from a XML parser? Just by rewriting it into a 100% PHP solution, it suddenly was twice faster to parse. (I know I only had two different xml tags to parse, but still... Complex nesting and all.)
Quote
Hence the reason I could implement <we:if "expression">, < tpl:something > will not break things since it'll be treated like a string, <tpl:something> will since tpl is a reserved namespace and it is unclosed, but it'll give a nice error message! And yeah, TOX-G can self-close tags :P.
As we said last time -- I like Tox-G, and I like the way Unknown solves problems, but I can't deal with it all by myself. If you guys went ahead and converted the templates for us, it would sure be nice. Right now, the best I can do is look through all of the non-admin templates, split them into as many sub-functions as required, and use PHP/HTML mode switching instead of echo's. Really... Best I can do, theoretically.
9505
Plugins / Re: Plugin hooks
« on April 1st, 2011, 04:33 PM »
Quote from texasman1979 on April 1st, 2011, 04:26 PM
i am merely expressing an alternative way of looking at the hooks concept.
Why, have you looked into ours in the first place? (It's pretty close to SMF's so I should think so.)
Quote
and i use commas and periods dammit. lol
But what about single quotes and uppercase among others?
Quote
and yall = wedge, nao, and arantor
Yall is Wedge, Nao and Arantor? When did we start calling ourselves Yall?
Do you mind if I call you and your car "Zlipt"?
Quote
i guess you never been to texas.
I've never been to the Americas, period.
Quote
well you ought to. lol
I'm living in France. The number one touristic destination in the world. And it's a damn fine country.
Still, it's an international forum and I'm doing my best to speak an understandable English for everyone's benefit.
If you're in Texas, Zlipt, which last I heard was part of the United States of America, with English as primary language, why exactly aren't you speaking proper international/commercial/business English in here?
9506
Plugins / Re: Plugin hooks
« on April 1st, 2011, 04:27 PM »
Quote from Dragooon on April 1st, 2011, 02:32 PM
Wait, I did reply about TOX-G's exact abilities, what are you trying to ask? How it works or what advantages it has over PHP?
How it works.
Quote
As far as TOX-G's functioning go :
1) Every template is defined in a XML like manner, you know the syntax.
Yeah, although I'm trying not to think too much about it... I'm already having a hard time getting used to HTML5's lack of self-closers ;) (Well, I could have left them in, but I don't see the point in wasting bandwidth when it's valid either way.[1])
Quote
It is easier to follow then pure PHP
...Except for programmers...
Quote
2) Every template can be altered to add an overlay before or after it, I believe every template can also be replaced but I haven't experimented with this.
Okay, then that's in no way better than Wedge for this..? Given that I can easily add a before/after/override hook to any template function as demonstrated earlier?
Quote
3) The template's files themselves are in a XML-esque manner which make sense for someone who don't know PHP but wants to do designing.
If they don't know PHP at all, is there a reason for them to know about XML..?
And as far as I can remember, broken XML (even slightly broken!) means broken *everything*? Unless Unknown wrote a custom parser that accepts any errors in the XML output... And/or the actual XML is treated as HTML, in which case everywhere you put some actual XML for ToxG's use, it will still fail horribly... (Let's say you type < tmp:something >, will it be parsed correctly? I know I'm quite torn myself whether or not I should add support for loose whitespace in my styling blocks...)
 1. I'm serious when I say I did my best to compensate for jQuery's download size... And these guys are adding more kilobytes to it on every single release, what the fork >_<
9507
Plugins / Re: Plugin hooks
« on April 1st, 2011, 04:20 PM »
Please, texasman. If you want to be read -- make us want to read you. Right now you're talking about this "yall" man I've never heard about, and you apparently have a problem with your punctuation keys. That's okay for short blurbs, but long posts need quite some effort to read.

Are you asking for something anyway? I'm not sure... I can't bother to read your long posts. See what I mean?
9508
Other software / Re: So, I've been asked...
« on April 1st, 2011, 03:42 PM »
Problem is, as I said: *they* put themselves into that situation. *They* showed us the door. *They* didn't like what we had to said, and finally *they* established that they'd go BSD and thus allow forks to be legal.

There is *no* logical explanation to them suddenly telling Pete that he isn't allowed to have a link to *his* website in his signature. If they don't want him to have the power to link to his website, maybe they shouldn't have let him post 44.444 times on their forum. They were too happy to get the free tech support from a coding genius. No one ever put as much effort as Pete did into SMF, and yet they're inventing new rules to benefit THEMSELVES and only themselves.

Seriously, that's exactly what I would have expected from the SMF team -- but I was hoping for a change in behavior because of the recent team changes. New team, same old shit.
Guys, if you want to compete, do it with WORK, not with your existing power.

Ever heard of Laurent Gbagbo these days on the news? If not, then google him...
9509
Other software / Re: So, I've been asked...
« on April 1st, 2011, 01:54 PM »
So, Pete... What's up with the SMF team? Did they write back or do they not care about your request?

Has anyone else received complaints?
9510
Off-topic / Re: Post count fever
« on April 1st, 2011, 01:37 PM »
Don't ask for too much ;)