This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
6602
Features / Re: New revs
« on January 20th, 2012, 08:02 PM »
rev 1264
(1 file, 1kb)
* Setting editor frame's body to maximum height, allowing Opera users to click anywhere in the frame to select it (other browsers don't seem to work as well here.) (editor.js)
! Firefox still needed the 'silly hack' to focus, even if not showing the blinking cursor. It's all about disabling the navigation keys... (editor.js)
(1 file, 1kb)
* Setting editor frame's body to maximum height, allowing Opera users to click anywhere in the frame to select it (other browsers don't seem to work as well here.) (editor.js)
! Firefox still needed the 'silly hack' to focus, even if not showing the blinking cursor. It's all about disabling the navigation keys... (editor.js)
6603
I just don't think that it's of any importance.
Yeah, it's cool to have your friends listed in the Like section (only your friends though...), and have a link to get a list of everyone who liked something. But in the end, what happens is that people don't care much about who liked something... They'll be likely to ignore the notice, and instead rely on positioning (i.e. they'll think that if some post is better liked, then it'll be positioned to its advantage in the list.)
That's mainly for topics, though, not for individual posts...
Yeah, it's cool to have your friends listed in the Like section (only your friends though...), and have a link to get a list of everyone who liked something. But in the end, what happens is that people don't care much about who liked something... They'll be likely to ignore the notice, and instead rely on positioning (i.e. they'll think that if some post is better liked, then it'll be positioned to its advantage in the list.)
That's mainly for topics, though, not for individual posts...
6604
Features / Re: New revs
« on January 20th, 2012, 05:28 PM »
rev 1263
(1 file, 3kb)
* A few more incremental rewrites for the editor. (editor.js)
* Renamed oTextHandle to oText, and made it a jQuery object. Rewrote related code to use jQuery as well.
* Renamed oweEditorCurrentResize to oCurrentResize.
* Renamed an onresize to onresizestart, to match the code in the PHP class.
- Removed instanceRef variables, never used (known song.)
- resizeTextArea() only takes one parameter. Removed all unrelated code, including that long function that calculated dimensions...
(1 file, 3kb)
* A few more incremental rewrites for the editor. (editor.js)
* Renamed oTextHandle to oText, and made it a jQuery object. Rewrote related code to use jQuery as well.
* Renamed oweEditorCurrentResize to oCurrentResize.
* Renamed an onresize to onresizestart, to match the code in the PHP class.
- Removed instanceRef variables, never used (known song.)
- resizeTextArea() only takes one parameter. Removed all unrelated code, including that long function that calculated dimensions...
6605
Features / Re: New revs
« on January 20th, 2012, 04:52 PM »
rev 1262
(4 files, 11kb)
* I'm going to go slowly with that editor rewrite mentioned on the forums... First, I'm committing things not related to removing (or keeping) the iframe. Then we'll see where it starts to go crazy. (editor.js)
- Removed blur/focus functions for IE. They weren't in use anyway.
- Removed unprotectText, integrated it in the only place where it was used.
- Removed debug breadcrumb, probably of some use to the SMF devs back in the day. Not anymore.
! Do not test for the existence of pasteHTML on a Range object that could very well be set to null...
! Fixed BBC tags being added in reverse order if the cursor is at the start of a line (in Chrome and Opera at least.)
@ As suggested in SMF's bug report #4071, but never applied to SMF itself.
* Moved surroundText and replaceText back into the editor object. I figured that they're too specific to be decently usable by plugins. They might as well write their own code (or just copy it from there, not an issue.) (post.js, editor.js)
* The Send PM page didn't have the right title. (PersonalMessage.php)
- Removed MegaVideo from Aeva's video site list. In case you didn't hear on the news, it would seem that they're gone for good... (Subs-Aeva-Sites.php)
(4 files, 11kb)
* I'm going to go slowly with that editor rewrite mentioned on the forums... First, I'm committing things not related to removing (or keeping) the iframe. Then we'll see where it starts to go crazy. (editor.js)
- Removed blur/focus functions for IE. They weren't in use anyway.
- Removed unprotectText, integrated it in the only place where it was used.
- Removed debug breadcrumb, probably of some use to the SMF devs back in the day. Not anymore.
! Do not test for the existence of pasteHTML on a Range object that could very well be set to null...
! Fixed BBC tags being added in reverse order if the cursor is at the start of a line (in Chrome and Opera at least.)
@ As suggested in SMF's bug report #4071, but never applied to SMF itself.
* Moved surroundText and replaceText back into the editor object. I figured that they're too specific to be decently usable by plugins. They might as well write their own code (or just copy it from there, not an issue.) (post.js, editor.js)
* The Send PM page didn't have the right title. (PersonalMessage.php)
- Removed MegaVideo from Aeva's video site list. In case you didn't hear on the news, it would seem that they're gone for good... (Subs-Aeva-Sites.php)
6607
The Pub / Re: Logo Madness
« on January 20th, 2012, 11:44 AM »
Okay, bit more contrast, and switching to a font I always liked but never tried for fear that it looked too much like a 'cool' font. (Don't ask.)
Readability is pretty good now. :)
:edit: Just for fun... A silly one ;)
:edit: This has got to be the simplest logo I've done since my monochrome one which Bloc liked so much... I'm sure he'd love that one, too! Still, did you notice how I tend to make something very sober, and then add stupid details to it until it becomes unbearable? And here it only took me 3 steps to reach that point... Eheh.
Readability is pretty good now. :)
:edit: Just for fun... A silly one ;)
:edit: This has got to be the simplest logo I've done since my monochrome one which Bloc liked so much... I'm sure he'd love that one, too! Still, did you notice how I tend to make something very sober, and then add stupid details to it until it becomes unbearable? And here it only took me 3 steps to reach that point... Eheh.
6608
The Pub / Re: Logo Madness
« on January 20th, 2012, 12:39 AM »
And I'm in Hell, surrounded by Loki and Satan Narrow!
6609
The Pub / Re: Logo Madness
« on January 20th, 2012, 12:25 AM »
I have no idea who likes what at this point, and for what reasons ;)
I for one would be happy to see my logos on restaurant menus... :P
Here's another before I go to bed. Spent too much time on this freakin' editor... -_-
I for one would be happy to see my logos on restaurant menus... :P
Here's another before I go to bed. Spent too much time on this freakin' editor... -_-
6610
Solution #3 would make more sense.
Suggestion? Instead of storing the user name, just store the ID... Then, at display time, instead of [nobbc][tt]<a href="?action=profile;u=$context[user_id]">name</a>[/tt], link to [tt]<we:$uid:$context[user_id]>[/tt]Or simply, don't give a damn about name changes...
Oh, bugger. Just go with solution 2. We only have to run that extra query if any names are found... (And if you don't have any friends in the like list, don't bother to show any name.)
I would personally go for solution 4, for my own taste, but I understand that it'd be seen as disappointing.
6611
The Pub / Re: Logo Madness
« on January 19th, 2012, 12:03 PM »They weren't there when I posted ;)
Lower case text works better (for a variety of reasons, but most importantly because it's actually easier to read),
and the lighter blue background certainly works better than the darker one but I still think it's taking something away from the text itself.
Posting a few tries I made yesterday, so they're not the most recent. Maybe you'll like one..?
:edit: And another few tries... Meh.
6612
The Pub / Re: Logo Madness
« on January 19th, 2012, 11:17 AM »
What about the rest...? Reversed icon, preference between uppercase and lowercase, etc...
I also uploaded a version without background. Needs some work.
I also uploaded a version without background. Needs some work.
6613
The Pub / Re: Logo Madness
« on January 19th, 2012, 10:50 AM »
Just a few notes...
- The current badge in the sidebar looks fantastic. However, I never got around to making it readable in small sizes. That's important to me -- we need to have a logo that is great in both large and small shapes.
- I actually never got bored of the 'simple' version (first choice in the poll). I tried doing more complex logos, but it's, once again, proving hard. I was satisfied with the 'framed' logo, too, but wanted a version that also worked horizontally. Hard, hard, hard.
- More annoyingly, the current logo in the bottom-right corner of the demo site (http://wedge.org/minilogo.png) still is my favorite when it comes to small logos. It has an extreme simplicity to it. I'll keep making tests around it, but I'm afraid I stupidly lost the original unresized file for it... :-/
- So, I made a few attempts that I posted above (unrelated to the minilogo). I didn't 'bump' my post because they weren't meant to be publicly debated (I will often post logos to see how they fare in a forum environment, then delete the attachments. This time I didn't delete them because they were referred to by later posts.)
- I'm posting my latest attempts. As you can see, they're only in SMALL sizes, that's because I want to stress-test their readability. The background color is subject to change, I may even remove it entirely although it's unlikely because it's important to the overall balance... As you can see, the idea was to get a compromise between text size compared to icon -- small text vs large icon in the sidebar badge (last poll choice), and large text vs small icon in the sidebar logo when you hover the badge (i.e. first poll choice). I also reversed the icon on its vertical axis, I feel it's an interesting variation. Finally, I made two versions: one with the lowercase text and drop shadow, one with uppercase text, and no drop shadow.
Do you think this is an interesting direction for the logo...?
They look *great* in the footer for the new skin (which I'm not making public, or even private, yet), but a bit disappointing on brighter backgrounds like here.
- The current badge in the sidebar looks fantastic. However, I never got around to making it readable in small sizes. That's important to me -- we need to have a logo that is great in both large and small shapes.
- I actually never got bored of the 'simple' version (first choice in the poll). I tried doing more complex logos, but it's, once again, proving hard. I was satisfied with the 'framed' logo, too, but wanted a version that also worked horizontally. Hard, hard, hard.
- More annoyingly, the current logo in the bottom-right corner of the demo site (http://wedge.org/minilogo.png) still is my favorite when it comes to small logos. It has an extreme simplicity to it. I'll keep making tests around it, but I'm afraid I stupidly lost the original unresized file for it... :-/
- So, I made a few attempts that I posted above (unrelated to the minilogo). I didn't 'bump' my post because they weren't meant to be publicly debated (I will often post logos to see how they fare in a forum environment, then delete the attachments. This time I didn't delete them because they were referred to by later posts.)
- I'm posting my latest attempts. As you can see, they're only in SMALL sizes, that's because I want to stress-test their readability. The background color is subject to change, I may even remove it entirely although it's unlikely because it's important to the overall balance... As you can see, the idea was to get a compromise between text size compared to icon -- small text vs large icon in the sidebar badge (last poll choice), and large text vs small icon in the sidebar logo when you hover the badge (i.e. first poll choice). I also reversed the icon on its vertical axis, I feel it's an interesting variation. Finally, I made two versions: one with the lowercase text and drop shadow, one with uppercase text, and no drop shadow.
Do you think this is an interesting direction for the logo...?
They look *great* in the footer for the new skin (which I'm not making public, or even private, yet), but a bit disappointing on brighter backgrounds like here.
6614
Features / Re: Selectbox
« on January 18th, 2012, 07:17 PM »
Then focus on that (and on trying to establish a realistic to-do list with me ;))
My forte is front-end programming, and what have I been working on..? Front-end!
We're not paid, there's no reason we should in addition work permanently on shit we don't want to touch :P
My forte is front-end programming, and what have I been working on..? Front-end!
We're not paid, there's no reason we should in addition work permanently on shit we don't want to touch :P
6615
Features / Re: Selectbox
« on January 18th, 2012, 05:56 PM »
You mean you've lost interest, or you think you've lost the required skill? :-/