This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
1201
Archived fixes / Re: Ignoring users
« on March 5th, 2014, 02:33 PM »
I was never comfy with the word ignore. Makes sense.
My first thought though, was to automatically ignore posts from people who are 'ignored' but also not in another of your lists.
My first thought though, was to automatically ignore posts from people who are 'ignored' but also not in another of your lists.
1202
Bug reports / [Posting] Re: Wrong attachment is uploaded
« on March 5th, 2014, 02:04 PM »
Just like Arantor said originally: did you test locally, and if yes, without the mass-attach plugin..?
1203
Archived fixes / Re: Pictures overlap the side bar
« on March 5th, 2014, 02:03 PM »
Okay, your overlapping is going to be fixed by that, but it's a silly fix if all you did was reduce the max-width... It means your browser is not adjusting the img width to its container, but to the page width, or something. Which is a browser bug.
Did you test in all browsers..? Because it definitely works with Chrome with the fix I gave you...
Did you test in all browsers..? Because it definitely works with Chrome with the fix I gave you...
1204
Features / Re: Poll: dropping oldIE
« on March 5th, 2014, 02:01 PM »
I don't know.
There are three levels of deprecation:
- Adding a mild warning on the page.
- Adding a very visible warning on the page.
- Adding a warning, and dropping IE7 specific hacks.
Right now, I'm on level 2 for both IE6 and IE7. Should I just make it a 'mild' warning? (i.e. drop the red background, opt for something more subtle, more bearable..?) Should I make the warning very visible only if the user is a member, and thus likely to stay on the forum for more than a couple of google hit reads?
As for dropping IE7 hacks, the only one I'd be interested in dropping is the sidebar macros. While it's a really, really neat solution, and one that no other systems have never used and never will, it's still something that's there to replace boring floats. I could possibly go to level 3 and replace the IE7 hack with a basic float to at least keep pages usable.
I don't know...
Interestingly, Google Analytics tells me that wedge.org visitors are only 9% IE users, and out of these, in the last week, only 1 (one!) IE6 user. However, I also added a custom script to log IE6 and IE7 users last night, and I've already got a hundred hits or something. About half of these are hits from strange unknown bots, such as "InfoPath.1", others are equally split between IE6 and IE7 users, and every time I analyzed the IP, it was coming from Russia or Asia, so these are 'real' people, just people that use a pirated copy of XP and don't want to connect to Microsoft servers. When will someone PLEASE tell them that Microsoft competitors don't give a damn about the XP license status, and that they'll happily provide them with the latest security patches for Chrome, Opera and Firefox..?
There are three levels of deprecation:
- Adding a mild warning on the page.
- Adding a very visible warning on the page.
- Adding a warning, and dropping IE7 specific hacks.
Right now, I'm on level 2 for both IE6 and IE7. Should I just make it a 'mild' warning? (i.e. drop the red background, opt for something more subtle, more bearable..?) Should I make the warning very visible only if the user is a member, and thus likely to stay on the forum for more than a couple of google hit reads?
As for dropping IE7 hacks, the only one I'd be interested in dropping is the sidebar macros. While it's a really, really neat solution, and one that no other systems have never used and never will, it's still something that's there to replace boring floats. I could possibly go to level 3 and replace the IE7 hack with a basic float to at least keep pages usable.
I don't know...
Interestingly, Google Analytics tells me that wedge.org visitors are only 9% IE users, and out of these, in the last week, only 1 (one!) IE6 user. However, I also added a custom script to log IE6 and IE7 users last night, and I've already got a hundred hits or something. About half of these are hits from strange unknown bots, such as "InfoPath.1", others are equally split between IE6 and IE7 users, and every time I analyzed the IP, it was coming from Russia or Asia, so these are 'real' people, just people that use a pirated copy of XP and don't want to connect to Microsoft servers. When will someone PLEASE tell them that Microsoft competitors don't give a damn about the XP license status, and that they'll happily provide them with the latest security patches for Chrome, Opera and Firefox..?
1205
Archived fixes / Re: Ignoring users
« on March 5th, 2014, 01:39 PM »
No, the feature isn't broken, it's just disabled... It's part of "contact lists" in the previous SMF terminology, and members were complaining that it was confusing, so I just disabled everything related to lists (buddies and ignore lists.)
I'm planning to restore functionality before we go beta, but it's not an absolute priority for me.
One of the problems I've been having with ignore lists, is that they're fundamentally not the same as the new contact list system's ignore lists.
The former allows you to hide messages from people you don't like.
The latter allows you to prevent specific people from seeing things you post to a specific contact list, EVEN if this person is part of that list. (e.g. you have a "friend" list, but you don't want to let your mother, who's also a friend, know anything private that you say to your friends, so...)
It's similar to the Facebook system, really. But it's not ignore lists as in SMF, which is why I'm leaving all of this aside for now.
I'm planning to restore functionality before we go beta, but it's not an absolute priority for me.
One of the problems I've been having with ignore lists, is that they're fundamentally not the same as the new contact list system's ignore lists.
The former allows you to hide messages from people you don't like.
The latter allows you to prevent specific people from seeing things you post to a specific contact list, EVEN if this person is part of that list. (e.g. you have a "friend" list, but you don't want to let your mother, who's also a friend, know anything private that you say to your friends, so...)
It's similar to the Facebook system, really. But it's not ignore lists as in SMF, which is why I'm leaving all of this aside for now.
1206
Features / Re: Poll: changing paths
« on March 5th, 2014, 12:32 AM »
Okay, if nobody's against this, I'll soon be removing the custom paths from Settings.php (anything that's not $boardurl and $boarddir, basically.)
I'll keep the others for now, as I said.
Since there might be security issues related to this, I've left the poll open for a few more days, in case someone wants to be heard. ;)
I'll keep the others for now, as I said.
Since there might be security issues related to this, I've left the poll open for a few more days, in case someone wants to be heard. ;)
1207
Features / Re: Poll: dropping oldIE
« on March 5th, 2014, 12:30 AM »
Pandos and Farjo, can you elaborate on real-life examples of users browsing with IE7 and not caring to switch to IE8 or better..?
* Nao is a bit distracted from Wedge today... A certain RPG game was released and I haven't played a game in like six months... :whistle:
1208
Features / Re: Poll: dropping oldIE
« on March 4th, 2014, 07:26 PM »
But they're still a PITA to keep compatible with. I know I was very unhappy with IE10's flexbox support (I managed to get it done, though), and IE11 had the oldIE compatibility mode removed, but then restored, but I've heard it's not as accurate as it used to be, so I'm hesitant in reinstalling it. For now, I'm on IE10.
1209
Archived fixes / Re: Installation problem
« on March 4th, 2014, 05:11 PM »
But did I understand it wrong? I thought that even the installer refused to run...
Otherwise, it would be 'relatively' safe to just have a web installer. This is part of my plans, but I don't know if it'll be in v1.0...
Basically: a script that self-downloads Wedge from github, and unzips it in the same location, or a sub-folder. Allowing for PHP to automatically have control of ALL files and folders. But, of course, you first need to have write access in that folder... :-/
Otherwise, it would be 'relatively' safe to just have a web installer. This is part of my plans, but I don't know if it'll be in v1.0...
Basically: a script that self-downloads Wedge from github, and unzips it in the same location, or a sub-folder. Allowing for PHP to automatically have control of ALL files and folders. But, of course, you first need to have write access in that folder... :-/
1210
Features / Re: Language revs
« on March 4th, 2014, 05:04 PM »
[Commit revision d705553]
Author: Nao (Signed-off)
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 17:03:59 +0100
Stats: 3 files changed; +5 (insertions), -1 (deletion)
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 17:03:59 +0100
Stats: 3 files changed; +5 (insertions), -1 (deletion)
- In preparation for the removal of oldIE support, which will be coming soon, I'm hereby adding a very visible (that's the goal!) error box for IE6/IE7 users, in the hope that it will encourage them to at least switch to another browser while they're visiting your forum. (Errors)
- Wrong path. It was changed between the moment the German translation was started, and now. (Install.german.php)
1211
Features / Re: New revs
« on March 4th, 2014, 05:03 PM »
[Commit revision dd59b61]
Author: Nao
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 17:03:14 +0100
Stats: 3 files changed; +19 (insertions), -0 (deletion)
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 17:03:14 +0100
Stats: 3 files changed; +19 (insertions), -0 (deletion)
- In preparation for the removal of oldIE support, which will be coming soon, I'm hereby adding a very visible (that's the goal!) error box for IE6/IE7 users, in the hope that it will encourage them to at least switch to another browser while they're visiting your forum. (Load.php, Errors.template.php, Errors.english.php)
1212
Archived fixes / Re: Installation problem
« on March 4th, 2014, 04:13 PM »
Sven, do you think this problem could be 'fixed' in any way that's, err... Either controllable by Wedge (so that we can avoid these support questions in the first place), or explainable without getting too technical...?
* Nao is a Linux noob. I know it's not good for a web software developer, but my goal is to make it accessible to other Linux noobs... :P
1213
Archived fixes / Re: Pictures overlap the side bar
« on March 4th, 2014, 03:52 PM »
I saw the post. The problem is quite obvious, there's a max-width: 100% but no height: auto for img tags, which will be fine MOST of the time, except if the person specifies desired picture dimensions, in which case the desired height will be kept, ending with a picture approx 350x600 (from 1024x768 resized manually to 800x600), on a shrunk window.
Is this it..?
PS: I still have your 27 previous PMs with the admin credentials, no need to send them every time unless you delete my admin account every time, eh eh ;)
Edit index.css, and change:
Code: [Select]
Add this:
Code: [Select]
Should work... I think!
Is this it..?
PS: I still have your 27 previous PMs with the admin credentials, no need to send them every time unless you delete my admin account every time, eh eh ;)
Posted: March 4th, 2014, 03:42 PM
Edit index.css, and change:
.bbc_img
border: 0
margin: 4px 8px
max-width: 100%Add this:
height: autoShould work... I think!
1214
Archived fixes / [Time Zone] Re: is 12 hours away from now
« on March 4th, 2014, 01:52 PM »
Looking at your profile, it seems that (1) your local time is correct, but (2) your timezone is the first one in the list. Wrong move when saving that page, maybe..?
Ninja'd!
Ninja'd!
1215
Archived fixes / Re: Installation problem
« on March 4th, 2014, 01:51 PM »
And/or try accessing the installer with /index.php, rather than just /..? Would this work?
(And/or technically, why didn't you simply copy the htaccess from /install into your root folder..?)
(And/or technically, why didn't you simply copy the htaccess from /install into your root folder..?)