Wedge

here ya go

+1

I'd also add the the number of likes there means absolutely nothing at this point. There are folk like me that like most if not all of what I've read but I haven't made it over to the FB page, so that's not a reflection of how I feel about Wedge (that's just me being too lazy to click a button that's right in front of me). Also, until users are able to test Wedge, there's no way for them to really gauge how the truly feel about it.

New, resolved already exist
Closed and On-hold will be added.
Confirmed, you'd have to convince Arantor to add :P

In theory custom fields (categories) can be used to achieve this as well.

And to think, much of that was from your advice :P

It just works better for me that way anyway... I get to completely ruin a local tester if needed until it works properly then I go live with it.

The fact that final brings nothing new to the table is why I'm already 'meh' about it. Of course on the day it's release there will be a bunch of 'congrats' posts... but I'm stuck on congrats for what? I do by all means have a high level of respect for those behind the coding because simply put if it for you all/them my site(s) wouldn't be where they are now or maybe I'd be still struggling along damning vb to hell and back.

My main site is still running RC3 with the security patch and 2 other mods to deal with security. In a recent discussion about what are we doing when Final hits I pointed out that the only real reason to move to RC5 or Final is SD2.0... no other reason unless someone can point out something that I'm missing. I'm ata point where I could careless really about whether or not final ever gets released (well with the exception of the licence change which, which affects you guys to some degree).

Regardless of what I have read about 2.0 Final being close or at the end of the month, there is nothing that tickles me to have that eager/cant wait/curious kind of feeling. I went from RC1.2 - RC2/3 only because it made sense and it moved to RC3 only a week or 2 before RC4 and cant see the benefit to moving to RC4or5 right now let alone final. As it stand every mod I use work and provide the functionality I seek... if SD 2.0 would work on RC3 even then I'd have less reason to upgrade.... so in short unless there are security fixes I really need to be concerned about in Final, I'll be on RC3 until SD2.0 is out and after that I stay where I am until/unless something better comes along.

Like this guy  :P
<---- Admittedly tho, I agree much of it doesnt make sense, it's more that I'm use to it so I'm not bothered by it

And I'm all for it  :eheh:
Then again my site doesnt have too many sensitive users at all, if you give them the option to like but not dislike, they will post their dislike in the thread anyway.

I get that much.. my statement was more based on whether a section needed to be declared if there is only 1 section... and that where they have section 2.1 is referring to Article II, section 1 opposed to section 1.0 being missing.

I took a look at a few corporate filings just out of curiosity and noticed that many do not declare section to an Article if there is only 1. As a far as Section 2.1 and I didnt come across any corporate filings using that format (admitted I dont care enough about the situation to search more than I already did) but I've seen a few other legal doc that used that format.