This is why I complain about tracking hits

Arantor

  • As powerful as possible, as complex as necessary.
  • Posts: 14,278
This is why I complain about tracking hits
« on August 19th, 2013, 01:30 AM »
No-one seems to understand why I complain as much as I do about the fallacy of maintaining a hit count.

Well, here's a perfect example. We have 9 users online. 2 are real, 6 are already logged as bots, the last one is... shock horror... a bot too.

Yup, that means that 77% of the users online when I just looked at not actual users. I don't think I've seen it go below 50% in the last few weeks (whenever I've been able to look)

Since we can't always keep an eye out for bots, and can't always keep the list up to date, seriously can't we just stop counting the number of online people yet? Or at the very least stop counting the records? (I still don't even want them shown to admins, to be honest, I'd rather just not track them)

 only_robots.png - 113.8 kB, 1009x904, viewed 180 times.

When we unite against a common enemy that attacks our ethos, it nurtures group solidarity. Trolls are sensational, yes, but we keep everyone honest. | Game Memorial

nolsilang

  • Lurking <i class=
  • Posts: 106
Re: This is why I complain about tracking hits
« Reply #1, on August 19th, 2013, 02:59 AM »
If the board admin really want to know how many users online now they can use Google Analytics[1]. They have a section called "Real Time" in their standard report. Unless the admins have a different purpose to show how many online users in their forum,
 1. It's pretty standard now to setup Google Analytics in any of your website. If you haven't yet, at least you will get the benefits of a great web analytics tool.

 000180.png - 21.14 kB, 1325x556, viewed 168 times.


Dragooon

  • I can code! Really!
  • polygon.com has to be one of the best sites I've seen recently.
  • Posts: 1,841
Re: This is why I complain about tracking hits
« Reply #2, on August 19th, 2013, 10:57 AM »
I agree with @0x, Google Analytics will most likely be a better tracking solution than anything we can come up with. Only downside being that paranoid people will feel Big G is taking all their privacy out, but IMO they're crazy :P
The way it's meant to be

Nao

  • Dadman with a boy
  • Posts: 16,061
Re: This is why I complain about tracking hits
« Reply #3, on August 19th, 2013, 11:29 AM »
Pete, you (at least) have my go-ahead to stop tracking *guests*, where they be human or bots, and just track members.
I think that this element (number of members online) is still worth tracking, at least on large communities, because it shows the commitment level over time; and if there are many guests (slashdotting etc), some of them are bound to register, and thus increase the number of online members, so as a 'relative' number, it's still working! :)

Wanchope

  • Posts: 232
Re: This is why I complain about tracking hits
« Reply #4, on August 31st, 2013, 08:27 AM »
I agree with @Nao, forum members online are worth tracking, outside of that is not useful to me. In my current forum, I removed online list from the board index and allow tracking of members in the individual posts. Tracking of bots and guests is just a waste of server resources. If I want to analyse my traffic, I will use the best tool online - Google Analytics.

Nao

  • Dadman with a boy
  • Posts: 16,061
Re: This is why I complain about tracking hits
« Reply #5, on August 31st, 2013, 01:57 PM »
For sure.
Although, TBH with you, I'm not sure I'll remove support for guest tracking right now... I mean, I have other priorities. I expected Pete to do it, really :P

Re: This is why I complain about tracking hits
« Reply #6, on August 31st, 2013, 04:20 PM »
I don't feel like removing guest tracking either(in my fork or Wedge really) since while its inaccurate, its still a useful indication of activity. Maybe you need to look at the tracking itself abit,or as suggested to word it differently, but removing it seems a unnecessary big move IMHO.

Nao

  • Dadman with a boy
  • Posts: 16,061

Re: This is why I complain about tracking hits
« Reply #8, on August 31st, 2013, 04:43 PM »
Yes, Its really just how you look upon it, and "relative" is exactly the right term here, as opposed to the members count which is a confirmed tracking.

If I need to track guests in detail I would use something like GA anyway.But I'd like a quick indicator if there IS really something to track down in GA - if I wanted to lol.

Wanchope

  • Posts: 232
Re: This is why I complain about tracking hits
« Reply #9, on September 1st, 2013, 12:01 AM »Last edited on September 1st, 2013, 12:10 AM
Tracking reliable ips and relative ones may not be that easy, twitter introduces new bots every now and then with each bot having it's unique ip. Just thinking if it worths all the stress.