MultiformeIngegno

  • Messages: 1 337
SPF records
« le 5 Janvier 2012 à 02:56 »
Hi guys! :)
Is there a SPF records "expert"? :P

Is this entry correct: "v=spf1 all" ?
What's the differences between "v=spf1 all" and "v=spf1 ~all" and "v=spf1 +all"

If I use Google Apps on my domain, is a good thing to have (instead of the entries above) this one?
"v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all"

Thanks in advance!! :cool:

Nao

  • Dadman with a boy
  • Messages: 16 082
Re: SPF records
« Réponse #1, le 6 Janvier 2012 à 21:37 »
(I have no idea, sorry... Just bumping so someone else can see it.)

Arantor

  • As powerful as possible, as complex as necessary.
  • Messages: 14 278
Re: SPF records
« Réponse #2, le 6 Janvier 2012 à 22:24 »
Citation
Is this entry correct: "v=spf1 all" ?
Correct to do what? What are you hoping to achieve?
Citation
If I use Google Apps on my domain, is a good thing to have (instead of the entries above) this one?
Refer to Google Apps' help on this.
Citation
"v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all"
AIUI, it means to tag entries that fall foul of the policy defined in _spf.google.com but mark it as a failure (while allowing it through)
When we unite against a common enemy that attacks our ethos, it nurtures group solidarity. Trolls are sensational, yes, but we keep everyone honest. | Game Memorial

MultiformeIngegno

  • Messages: 1 337
Re: SPF records
« Réponse #3, le 6 Janvier 2012 à 23:35 »
Citation de Lurker le 6 Janvier 2012 à 22:24
Citation
Is this entry correct: "v=spf1 all" ?
Correct to do what? What are you hoping to achieve?
I'm trying to have a correct SPF record because I had troubles of mail sent from my server marked as spam..

Arantor

  • As powerful as possible, as complex as necessary.
  • Messages: 14 278
Re: SPF records
« Réponse #4, le 6 Janvier 2012 à 23:38 »
Then v=spf1 all won't help you, because it'll just pass everything through as accepted, as I understood the Wikipedia entry on SPF records.

MultiformeIngegno

  • Messages: 1 337