On one forum I'm a member of, they have both like and dislike, and as well as it being per post, each user can see how many times their posts were liked/disliked in total.
I don't post there *that* often, 186 posts in a shade over 3 years, of which Like/Dislike only appeared in the last year or so, and I've personally had 270 likes and 55 dislikes (of which 12 were a single post)
But I've seen people get 70+ dislikes on a single post in the past.
(This forum is quite big, about 1.1m posts, but mostly because that's all comments on new stories, and many stories do readily hit 100+ replies. Mind you, the readership is mostly cynical people, so downvotes do happen quite often, and invariably there's a "Before the haters downvote me[1]...")
I suspect the fact names aren't attached to it does make a difference, and I can see providing the option both ways (names/no names, maybe names for author only as an option) could be good.
I don't post there *that* often, 186 posts in a shade over 3 years, of which Like/Dislike only appeared in the last year or so, and I've personally had 270 likes and 55 dislikes (of which 12 were a single post)
But I've seen people get 70+ dislikes on a single post in the past.
(This forum is quite big, about 1.1m posts, but mostly because that's all comments on new stories, and many stories do readily hit 100+ replies. Mind you, the readership is mostly cynical people, so downvotes do happen quite often, and invariably there's a "Before the haters downvote me[1]...")
I suspect the fact names aren't attached to it does make a difference, and I can see providing the option both ways (names/no names, maybe names for author only as an option) could be good.
| 1. | They use upvote and downvote, but it means the same thing, since names aren't given. |








