Arantor

  • As powerful as possible, as complex as necessary.
  • Posts: 14,278
Re: Changes to banning
« Reply #15, on December 23rd, 2012, 06:20 PM »
But every time I sneeze, another sneak preview escapes ;P It's more a metaphorical thing.
When we unite against a common enemy that attacks our ethos, it nurtures group solidarity. Trolls are sensational, yes, but we keep everyone honest. | Game Memorial

godboko71

  • Fence accomplished!
  • Hello
  • Posts: 361
Re: Changes to banning
« Reply #16, on December 23rd, 2012, 06:24 PM »
Lol well then don't get better soon :p I should sleep more
Thank you,
Boko

Arantor

  • As powerful as possible, as complex as necessary.
  • Posts: 14,278

Drunken Clam

  • Drool, drool, drool....!
  • Posts: 154
Re: Changes to banning
« Reply #18, on January 13th, 2013, 09:30 PM »
That is just sooooo cool.... probably the coolest of all things that are cool.... but I have had quite a lot of whiskey today! :)

MultiformeIngegno

  • Posts: 1,337

Aaron Smith

  • The mini menus on Thoughts... Damn Sexy!
  • Posts: 39
Re: Changes to banning
« Reply #20, on January 14th, 2013, 06:05 AM »
I'm really digging the idea of Soft Bans. I've never really been a fan of banning real people, but there has to be some consequence to deter unacceptable behavior. This seems like a good compromise between Hard Bans of real users and just letting them do whatever the hell they want. :eheh:

~ Aaron

Arantor

  • As powerful as possible, as complex as necessary.
  • Posts: 14,278
Re: Changes to banning
« Reply #21, on January 15th, 2013, 03:45 AM »
Well, soft bans aren't new, but the approach is a little bit different to what others do.

I'm having a lot of fun with the next part of the warning/banning/miscreant management system as I've hinted on the thoughts ;)