Wedge

Since we often have the same spelling and pronunciation of words for different parts of speech (more can be used as an adjective, an adverb, or (rarely) as a noun), we don't much care about the difference between adjectives and adverbs.
So it is common to see "She spoke quickly, but he spoke quicker than she did", even though it is grammatically incorrect.

http://www.grammarbook.com/grammar/adjAdv.asp

UK or US English, out of interest?

(American IP.)

I was guessing American anyway, but I figured I'd clarify. US and UK English are very interestingly at odds with one another a lot of the time.

Stop readin' the Oatmeal, FFS :P

http://theoatmeal.com/comics/minor_differences4

I say, what's that, old bean? :D

You forget, though, I'm firmly British and I regularly talk to Americans - and do find myself dealing with the accent barrier and more generally the language barrier. It's not a high barrier but it is a barrier nonetheless.[1]

But for true accent win, get a Brit, an American and a Canadian on the same conference call. ;)

1.	That pretty much proves I'm English. I have yet to see an American use 'nonetheless' and not mean it in a parody of Englishness, or otherwise trying to impress.

I must be even weirder, with my constant mix between US and UK expressions. That's what happens when you learn English mostly from TV shows and the Internet. You tend to hear a bit of both ;)

Ha!

Try living with an American in the UK (now naturalised I should point out)... She's infected me with Americanisms, and complains at me when I use them!

I blame the feral fire trucks...

That's the thing, it never really struck me as weird; your English is better than that of most people I know, as it happens.Score one for irony ;)

Love your sig, PantsMan :P

Aw, yeah, I didn't actually notice that before, but yes, that's awesome, haha!

Tommy Saxondale FTW - not too keen on much of Steve Coogan's recent works, but there were bits of Saxondale that made me laugh out loud.

good ole americanisms.

All the zeds.  I mean zee's.

Okay, I'm currently looking into doing a mass replace from 'smf_' to 'we_' in the codebase...
There are about 700 occurrences, I'm checking them manually and then I'll do the replacement.

So far so good, but apparently sessions are named smf_sess_*. Do you think it's still okay to replace them? I mean, at the worst it'll reset the session, right...?

Oh, and I know it means we can take even less code verbatim from other versions of SMF... But do we really need to?