Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Oracle
46
Other software / Re: Discussing Elkarte on wedge.org
« on January 21st, 2013, 08:55 AM »
Concur..and surrender~!
47
Other software / Re: Discussing Elkarte on wedge.org
« on January 20th, 2013, 09:53 PM »
Not where I come from...

They've made a TV series about nerds and how wonderful they are. Ladies of all types simply drooling over the prospect they may get noticed by one of these heavily prized creatures. Never really watched the programme as it wasn't my cup of tea. Nonetheless it was aired suggesting nerds were on their way up in the world. Cant remember the name of the show. From that I made the general observation that nerds were popular. Doesn't matter merely a bit of goss.

Bartender???/ sounds like Ted Danson and show Cheers just a bunch of broken down has been's  frequenting their regular watering hole. Wouldn't exactly categorize them as nerds if that's what you were suggesting.

Unfamiliar with The Book of Mormon really.
48
Other software / Re: Discussing Elkarte on wedge.org
« on January 20th, 2013, 09:12 AM »
Nerds are cool, you know why.....women adore them! > I know I'm digressing a little but I'm also keen on Seinfeld. George an Kramer are absolutely hilarious.
49
Other software / Re: Discussing Elkarte on wedge.org
« on January 20th, 2013, 12:09 AM »
Quote from Nao on January 19th, 2013, 07:03 PM
We're all more of less Sheldons in here. No need to feel bad about it ;)
:lol:ha hahah great show that.
50
Other software / Re: Discussing Wedge on simplemachines.org
« on January 12th, 2013, 12:38 AM »
Seems to me that the underlying issue with all this stems from peoples DIFFERENCES OF OPINION in all areas of development / management. Resulting in feelings of rejection, questions of self worth, challenges of ego, beliefs that one persons ideas are far better than another's and so on. And the fact that no resolve is possible purely because you simply cant please everyone!

And the fact that there is no real mechanism that's in place to ensure things are being handled so as to foster enthusiasm and @ the same time provide the necessary timelines or goals that are generally seen to be prerequisites for any operation either small or large.

Having to cater for everyone's whim is one thing that SMF is stuck with and it becomes infinitely harder as the team expands whereas in Wedges case less people result in fewer clashes of opinion. Things can be discussed and resolved in a timely fashion without encountering the red tape and personality clashes that are prevalent in a larger scale operation.
51
Features / Re: New revs - Public comments
« on January 6th, 2013, 02:09 AM »
Yeah, what he said!
52
The Pub / Re: Looking for volunteers to test the Wedge private alpha!
« on December 25th, 2012, 02:39 AM »
I'm doing as much as I can by reading all these posts - If I can contribute in any way I will.
53
Off-topic / Re: Need help with my Interwebs connection
« on November 29th, 2012, 11:41 PM »
Nao,

Have you thought of trying WIN8?
54
Development blog / Re: It only took two guys two years...
« on November 28th, 2012, 11:26 PM »
Ha Ha. > Sounds like your in the wrong business - Should be in pest extermination of some sort...real job real doe - "Only kidding Nate"
55
The Pub / Re: Looking for volunteers to test the Wedge private alpha!
« on October 30th, 2012, 11:15 PM »
Really great to see this getting off the ground. Hats off to both of you! :cool:
56
The Pub / Re: Logo Madness
« on September 18th, 2012, 06:47 PM »
Quote from Nao on September 18th, 2012, 03:53 PM
Headaches, headaches... I'm seriously at a loss. I think I should be making different polls for the logo shape, the font face, and general color sets.

Just look at this, for instance. I've made a custom version of the 'old' minilogos with the new font. Do you like the older one (Aller Display) or newer one (Sansation Italics) best?
(The dark one is exactly the same size as the footer version. The light one is a bit bigger, and I added a touch of a gradient to make it less dull. It works quite better although I've grown tired of the color blue in there.)
Nyrrr...Ditch the Sansation and use the typeface similar to Eras as used in W logo. It will match what you have done in the Warm skin. A tad more vertical spacing between logo and wedge lettering.
57
The Pub / Re: Logo Madness
« on September 17th, 2012, 08:46 PM »
Firstly for a proper poll comparison might I suggest you display ALL logos the same size.

Also - In your latest effort, ( Looking good in wine ) identical font and sizing as the W styled one would be nice as it is more pronounced. Maybe slightly more separation between the image and font as well.

Generally speaking I find the wedge lettering in all examples is too small in comparison to the image, theres not enough balance. - I know what your going to say about that. My answer....

Might have to stretch the wedges or reduce to accomodate!
58
The Pub / Re: Logo Madness
« on September 13th, 2012, 07:57 PM »
Quote from Nao on September 12th, 2012, 03:21 PM
Quote from Oracle on September 12th, 2012, 02:16 PM
Just did..> First ones my favourite, coloring does it for me I guess.
Can you elaborate please?
I'm always interested in knowing what makes people 'tick'.

Here's a variation with a different (rounder) shape and different color for the W. I don't like it as much, it's just that it's still a bit fun.
Hi Nao,

Logos they’re time consuming, but fun nonetheless. I commented on colouring of option1 logo in latest poll for two reasons.

1.   I believe it’s something the majority of people overlook when dabbling in theme or logo design. It’s every bit as important as the layout itself and has the potential of either encapsulating the whole presentation giving it a CRISP overall look or conversely, to provide ones work with an air of blandness with no appeal @ all.
 
2.    The chosen colours are FLAT first and foremost; they’re bold but not overstated and actually compliment your themes appearance in more ways you could imagine.

The simple white backdrop in my view emphasises the plain or FLAT colours of the image more so than your latest logos, providing the one I have chosen with more presence which is what should be happening. The use of filters is `noise’ and can be done without.

The logo I have selected would work on dark backgrounds as in lower left footer area and equally as well on lighter shades throughout the theme particularly @ the top as a main image. It’s neutral, it’s SIMPLE and as pointed out can be used anywhere even as a background to your favicon BUT without rounded corners. They’re not needed. There seems to be a tendency toward complicating the other examples through use of filters. Keeping it simple through use of plain colouring is subtle but very effective. It also lends itself to reproduction should you require business cards T shirts, whatever -  images would be produced with greater clarity than logos with shades of varying degrees.

Nao How about you install option 1  in all three places favicon,header and footer and see the result? - Not bad eh,  ditch the rounded corners in favicon though. Plain colours on white right!

As for the newest creation I’m not a fan of it tbh. Just not fond of the styling or the W the way it is although it is more synonymous of the wedge brand than the one we’re discussing. Maybe truncated W is the answer? Viz...   \|/ Wedge...Simple remember!

The issue I had with my preferred logo was that the two wedge type images above the text didn’t really capitalize enough on the Wedge name. It somehow got lost in the translation but if you were searching for a more abstract feel that s entirely your prerogative. Maybe I’m wrong and abstract was the way to go?
 
59
The Pub / Re: Logo Madness
« on September 12th, 2012, 02:16 PM »
Just did..> First ones my favourite, coloring does it for me I guess.
60
The Pub / Re: Controversial idea: post moderation on by default
« on September 4th, 2012, 10:34 PM »
Quote from Arantor on September 4th, 2012, 09:24 PM
I wondered, would it be worth shipping with a moderation rule in by default where people with less than 5 posts (who aren't moderators) are automatically post moderated?

I suspect it would encourage people to understand how the system works by having a working example in there by default?

For those coming from SMF: I totally gutted the post moderation system to be rules-based. For example:
 * someone tries to make a new post
 * moderate the post if:
   1) they have less than 5 posts
   2) they are not an Administrator, Global Moderator or Board Moderator

There are other permutations, for example you can push it to moderation if there's x number of links posted, or the user is in other groups or has a given warning level or the post contains certain words. It doesn't really matter exactly what, at this stage, just wondering if it should ship with a default rule set up.
Again, do what you like with this Pete, but from my perspective I imposed a 2 post count restriction on new members and it caused nothing but confusion so reinstated to zero. I feel you should lay out the welcome mat for newbys not an obstacle course. make it as easy as possible for them to sign up and get going as quickly as possible.