Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - MultiformeIngegno
376
The Pub / Re: Troubles during installation
« on November 9th, 2012, 12:13 AM »
Quote from Nao on November 8th, 2012, 12:08 AM
I think you're gonna have to share your FTP credentials with me so I can debug in real time at install time.
Make good use of them :D
377
The Pub / Re: Troubles during installation
« on November 7th, 2012, 10:09 PM »
The installation should work with chmod 0755/0775/0777. The fact that can't detect lang files isn't normal, so here are useful reports that reproduce this "problem" (if this is a problem or just a misconfiguration of my VPS), not ones that tell everything's ok (that's the normality).

Anyway, relax
378
The Pub / Re: Troubles during installation
« on November 7th, 2012, 08:04 PM »
Quote from agent47 on November 7th, 2012, 06:00 PM
I had no problems whatsoever with the installation of Alpha 2.
We're all happy for you
Posted: November 7th, 2012, 08:02 PM
Quote from Nao on November 7th, 2012, 12:42 AM
Folder perms should be 0755, not 755.
File perms should be 0644.

Or maybe it's the other way around... But don't forget the 0 which indicates it's an octal number. Otherwise your permissions will fail.
It was already octal.. -_-
379
Off-topic / Re: XenForo lawsuit
« on November 7th, 2012, 01:44 AM »
Let's hope try come here :D
380
The Pub / Re: Troubles during installation
« on November 7th, 2012, 12:15 AM »
Quote from Arantor on November 7th, 2012, 12:01 AM
Still think it's a permissions problem because if it weren't, it would have affected everyone...
I really don't know what else to try. :(
It's in the same VPS of a SMF install (same permissions and same user www-data)..
maybe I should try to reupload files..?
381
The Pub / Re: Troubles during installation
« on November 6th, 2012, 11:59 PM »
Quote from Arantor on November 6th, 2012, 11:41 PM
Odds are it's your permissions. There is no reason everything should be 777.
I tried with 775 and 755 too..
chmod -R 775 ....
chown -R www-data ......
382
The Pub / Re: Troubles during installation
« on November 6th, 2012, 11:35 PM »
Someone..? I can't proceed with the installation :D
383
The Pub / Troubles during installation
« on November 6th, 2012, 06:50 PM »
Alpha 2. I uploaded everything in a /forum/ dir owned by www-data (that runs PHP) and chmodded 777. Moved /forum/root files to /forum
When I go to /forum/install.php I get the error:
This installer was unable to find the installer's language file or files. They should be found under:
/forum/Themes/default/languages

They're there. I can even access via browser the file (for example) /forum/Themes/default/languages/Admin.french.php (of course a white page, but no 404 error).
PHP logs are blank

Setup:
PHP 5.4.8
nginx: 1.3.8
APC: 3.1.13
mysql: 5.5.28
384
Archived fixes / Re: Wedge Alpha 0.2, Post Screen
« on November 6th, 2012, 12:54 PM »
Uhm, maybe, you had some leftover from alpha 1 in your browser cache?
385
The Pub / Re: Hardening admin security
« on November 6th, 2012, 02:25 AM »
Quote
If you're already using some Google service and/or a smartphone with location services and/or adding your data to a website that use Adwords, Analytics and so on, it's not a big deal to tell google you're the admin of X forum. If you're using these services/sites and you're concerned about your privacy, you should rethink your way of being online
I think that it's important to understand what implies what. It's important that people know how to protect their privacy. I'm saying this:
if you're concerned about some info, nowadays you have to have some technical knowledge. I don't know the % of gmail market share, but it's huge. Now think about the normal user, they go to google, search for something always from the same pc, than maybe use youtube or their phone to look for a route. Google already started gathering your data (about location too if you use your phone).
Also if you use google without logging in on one of their services, then maybe you login on a forum that use adsense, they won.
What I'm saying is that it's really DIFFICULT to hide.
You should be an aknowledged user to do that! And an aknowledged user would know how to disable this method with the manual way.
386
The Pub / Re: Hardening admin security
« on November 6th, 2012, 02:11 AM »
Quote from Arantor on November 6th, 2012, 02:01 AM
He said that '99.7% of all the websites are analysed', what does that even mean? It doesn't actually mean anything, because it's not about the sites, it's about the users...
It's actually the same. They just need you to be logged in on one site they have their code in and they can easily associate your IP with some data (username, name and in their best case, email).
Posted: November 6th, 2012, 02:08 AM

I'm just saying this:
If you're concerned about your data, you can switch back to "normal authentication". If you're already using some Google service and/or a smartphone with location services and/or adding your data to a website that use Adwords, Analytics and so on, it's not a big deal to tell google you're the admin of X forum. If you're using these services/sites and you're concerned about your privacy, you should rethink your way of being online
387
The Pub / Re: Hardening admin security
« on November 6th, 2012, 01:58 AM »
I know, I was referring to tracking when I said iframe or JavaScript. I think I know a lot about Google's tracking. I saw 1+ hour of a conference of a guy called Matteo Flora, who studied for a while Google's tracking methods and published a lot about it. Summing all Google's method to track users, he ended up that 99,7% of all the websites are "analyzed" by Google in some ways (Analytics, Adwords, google DNS, Firefox's search bar and a lot of others). So, it's almost no info for Google that X user admins X forum, they already know it! And, likely, in the domain WhoIs there's also your home address :P
388
The Pub / Re: Hardening admin security
« on November 6th, 2012, 01:41 AM »
Maybe you're right about Google's tentacles, but I think that in this case they're not being.. "evil". :P
It's an open source project, they're not inserting any strange code (iframe, js or other).
Anyway it's your choice, I'm not pretending anything (of corse) :)
Just talking
389
The Pub / Re: Hardening admin security
« on November 6th, 2012, 01:34 AM »
Quote from Arantor on November 6th, 2012, 01:24 AM
How is it more comfortable to use than clicking on a link in an email?
You don't need to have sendmail() enabled or postfix/exim installed.. and it's more modern than email links (that look so.. old style! :P)
For the user POV, he doesn't need to remove the emails from his inbox! If he logs in often he would have the inbox full
390
The Pub / Re: Hardening admin security
« on November 6th, 2012, 01:18 AM »
Oh, talking about extra stuff and effort in including it I can't speak. I can only report that it's extremely comfortable (I use it for quite a bit of services) and as my edit said, also big projects are starting to use it (Dropbox, AWS).