« Sub-boards not marked as new...
SMF bug 4905 (signature length verified before preparsecode)
My fixes to Subs-Boards »

Arantor

  • As powerful as possible, as complex as necessary.
  • Messages: 14 278
When we unite against a common enemy that attacks our ethos, it nurtures group solidarity. Trolls are sensational, yes, but we keep everyone honest. | Game Memorial

Nao

  • Dadman with a boy
  • Messages: 16 082
Re: SMF bug 4905 (signature length verified before preparsecode)
« Réponse #16, le 17 Mai 2012 à 13:34 »
I'm positive that I specified it's a SMF bug. (ie everytime I fix a bug, I check the SMF 2.0 codebase to see if it's there too. If it is, I specify it in the changelog so that the SMF team can fix it as well.)

emanuele

  • Messages: 125

Arantor

  • As powerful as possible, as complex as necessary.
  • Messages: 14 278

nend

  • When is a theme, no longer what it was when installed?
  • Messages: 165
SI Community

Arantor

  • As powerful as possible, as complex as necessary.
  • Messages: 14 278

nend

  • When is a theme, no longer what it was when installed?
  • Messages: 165
Re: SMF bug 4905 (signature length verified before preparsecode)
« Réponse #21, le 18 Mai 2012 à 01:39 »
Citation de Arantor le 18 Mai 2012 à 01:34
The quick search defaults based on where you are - if you're in a topic, it defaults to that topic, if you're in a board - default to that board, otherwise search the whole forum.
That automatically thinking for a user might be a pain though. What if I want to search the entire forums for something while I am in the post.

I haven't done much searching here so I haven't notice the search behavior. I can see myself if I didn't know this information like "WTF, the search isn't searching right" lol.

But I was referring to the saying. :D

Arantor

  • As powerful as possible, as complex as necessary.
  • Messages: 14 278

Nao

  • Dadman with a boy
  • Messages: 16 082
Re: SMF bug 4905 (signature length verified before preparsecode)
« Réponse #23, le 18 Mai 2012 à 07:20 »
Yup, touched nothing... ;)
However, Noisen and a few others (sm.org :P) allow you to define your scope manually with a select box. It's just something that's been in my to-do list for so long (and so easy to do!) that I'm wondering whether I'll actually THINK of implementing it here... :lol:

Arantor

  • As powerful as possible, as complex as necessary.
  • Messages: 14 278
Re: SMF bug 4905 (signature length verified before preparsecode)
« Réponse #24, le 18 Mai 2012 à 12:54 »
I think the scope aspect is a pretty neat idea and have no idea why it wasn't introduced into the core by default. Note that while there is a mod for it, it is modified in sm.org's case and I'd love to see making that at least a little extensible ;)

emanuele

  • Messages: 125

Nao

  • Dadman with a boy
  • Messages: 16 082

MultiformeIngegno

  • Messages: 1 337
« Sub-boards not marked as new...
My fixes to Subs-Boards »