Initial forecasts of Wedge installs/conversions
« on May 30th, 2013, 01:24 AM »
Doubly so if they don't at least try to read."
Oh, I'm sorry. Did I break your concentration? I didn't mean to do that. Please, continue. You were sayin' something about "best intentions"? *silence* What's the matter? Oh, y-you were finished? Oh, well, allow me to retort. What does your bug look like?
What?
What country are you from?
What?
"What" ain't no country I ever heard of! They speak English in "What"?!
What?
English, motherfucker, do you speak it?!
Yes.
Then you know what I'm saying.
Yes.
Describe what your bug looks like.
What?
Say "what" again. SAY WHAT AGAIN. I dare you, I double dare you, motherfucker, say what one more goddamn time!
@Boko: You can always contribute them now if you like... that's why we deliberately run Wedge either directly from SVN or only a day or so's revisions behind, so that as it evolves, we can show you and involve you in the process of doing so.
Officially, linking here from That Other Place is still officially verboten, but if there's a useful post here, then it's worth linking ;)
It has happened that we've offered useful information back to them in the past and got it linked to here, e.g. I seem to recall debates about SMF development, when we'd already done it... hell, I posted a few requests for features with screenshots of what I'd already done ;)
Officially, linking here from That Other Place is still officially verboten, but if there's a useful post here, then it's worth linking ;)
How about in this board:
"Site Comments, Issues and Concerns
Comments on this slick site? Post them here. (SMF bugs should be reported in Bug Reports.)"
"Dear Mr Sm.org Administrator, have you considered upgrading this forum to Wedge? It is based on SMF but has more features and fewer bugs :)"

