I've long thought that Git and Mercurial seem like they should work better when there's a bigger team. With just two contributors it seems a little unnecessary.
Re: Git
« Reply #15, on January 8th, 2011, 11:11 AM »
Did it keep the entire revision history?
I can see it being beneficial when there's a proper release cycle, along with 2 people who have some radically different ideas because then branching makes sense. Plus you guys do seek to expand, don't you?