See attached
📎 FireShot Screen Capture #078 - 'Show Thoughts (3859)' - wedge_org_do_thoughts.png - 21.87 kB, 295x420, viewed 768 times.
A confident man keeps quiet.whereas a frightened man keeps talking, hiding his fear.
This topic was marked solved by its starter, on June 9th, 2013, 03:57 AM
live627
-
-
- Should five per cent appear too small / Be thankful I don't take it all / 'Cause I'm the taxman, yeah I'm the taxman
- Posts: 1,670
Arantor
-
-
- As powerful as possible, as complex as necessary.
- Posts: 14,278
The links missing colours (which are all the other side of the >> from what I can see)... do they also still contain <URL> in them too?
When we unite against a common enemy that attacks our ethos, it nurtures group solidarity. Trolls are sensational, yes, but we keep everyone honest. | Game Memorial
live627
-
-
- Should five per cent appear too small / Be thankful I don't take it all / 'Cause I'm the taxman, yeah I'm the taxman
- Posts: 1,670
No.
Arantor
-
-
- As powerful as possible, as complex as necessary.
- Posts: 14,278
That's odd, then, because if the parser is finding and replacing the <URL> there is no reason why it wouldn't also get the action=profile link... are the links prettified?
(See, the weird thing is, I can't reproduce it, it works as expected for me...)
(See, the weird thing is, I can't reproduce it, it works as expected for me...)
live627
-
-
- Should five per cent appear too small / Be thankful I don't take it all / 'Cause I'm the taxman, yeah I'm the taxman
- Posts: 1,670
Yes, they are prettified.
Oh, wait, maybe you aren't looking in the right place. This is All Thoughts.
Oh, wait, maybe you aren't looking in the right place. This is All Thoughts.
Arantor
-
-
- As powerful as possible, as complex as necessary.
- Posts: 14,278
Ah yes, that makes sense, I can reproduce and I see exactly why it is so. I will fix this in my next commit.
Should be fixed in r2158. If you'll notice, it's not that the link is not coloured, it is actually pointing to the wrong page entirely. (And because it's the wrong link, it gets the wrong colouring.)
What's happening is that it was pulling the parent thought's owner as the child thought's owner id and building the link off that even though it has the right name to work off (because *that* join is correct)
What's happening is that it was pulling the parent thought's owner as the child thought's owner id and building the link off that even though it has the right name to work off (because *that* join is correct)
Nao
- Dadman with a boy
-
-
- Posts: 16,082
Should be fixed in r2158. If you'll notice, it's not that the link is not coloured, it is actually pointing to the wrong page entirely. (And because it's the wrong link, it gets the wrong colouring.)
What's happening is that it was pulling the parent thought's owner as the child thought's owner id and building the link off that even though it has the right name to work off (because *that* join is correct)
Arantor
-
-
- As powerful as possible, as complex as necessary.
- Posts: 14,278
Yeah, you had to go into All Thoughts to see it. Then look for, say, the ones where xrunner is replying to one of mine. Or even ones where you're replying to me - the @ link in the reply is the wrong link.
Nao
- Dadman with a boy
-
-
- Posts: 16,082
Ah... Yes, confirmed! Silly-silly-silly-me! :lol:
Arantor
-
-
- As powerful as possible, as complex as necessary.
- Posts: 14,278
Yeah, took me a while to realise what was going on too but fortunately not a huge thing to fix :)