I was wondering about this, since I figure it was inevitably going to come up (if nothing else, I'll probably end up wanting to do it)
Now, I figure there's a way that we can do that and make life quite easy to support the English British set without too much extra work.
loadLanguage already loads English standard anyway, as a fallback, so the required strings should always be declared. But if you're doing that, you can be very cheeky and just have English British quite literally be *only the changed strings*. If there's no difference between English and English British for a given string, why define it again?
There is one caveat: right now, the load-fallback is actually a setting, though there's no UI for it, because I figure you almost never would change it (and if you did want to change it, it's not like you couldn't just tweak the code manually... if you're at the stage where it would make a difference, you're going to be up to making code changes)
Curious to know what the thoughts are on this, both technically and generally.
Now, I figure there's a way that we can do that and make life quite easy to support the English British set without too much extra work.
loadLanguage already loads English standard anyway, as a fallback, so the required strings should always be declared. But if you're doing that, you can be very cheeky and just have English British quite literally be *only the changed strings*. If there's no difference between English and English British for a given string, why define it again?
There is one caveat: right now, the load-fallback is actually a setting, though there's no UI for it, because I figure you almost never would change it (and if you did want to change it, it's not like you couldn't just tweak the code manually... if you're at the stage where it would make a difference, you're going to be up to making code changes)
Curious to know what the thoughts are on this, both technically and generally.







