Is accumulating Editor in wedge like the one in wordpress a big deal

Nao

  • Dadman with a boy
  • Posts: 16,079

Arantor

  • As powerful as possible, as complex as necessary.
  • Posts: 14,278
Re: Is accumulating Editor in wedge like the one in wordpress a big deal
« Reply #16, on October 5th, 2011, 09:54 PM »
I don't know how to handle them yet.

Doing it how SMF does it, though, is a no-go, because their editor accepts the smiley but on conversion, converts it to a generic img tag. This has other consequences, not just the obvious one about taking more processor time to process, like users who have different smiley sets to the forum default.
When we unite against a common enemy that attacks our ethos, it nurtures group solidarity. Trolls are sensational, yes, but we keep everyone honest. | Game Memorial

Nao

  • Dadman with a boy
  • Posts: 16,079

Arantor

  • As powerful as possible, as complex as necessary.
  • Posts: 14,278

Nao

  • Dadman with a boy
  • Posts: 16,079

Arantor

  • As powerful as possible, as complex as necessary.
  • Posts: 14,278

Nao

  • Dadman with a boy
  • Posts: 16,079

Arantor

  • As powerful as possible, as complex as necessary.
  • Posts: 14,278

Nao

  • Dadman with a boy
  • Posts: 16,079

Arantor

  • As powerful as possible, as complex as necessary.
  • Posts: 14,278
Re: Is accumulating Editor in wedge like the one in wordpress a big deal
« Reply #24, on October 6th, 2011, 12:57 AM »
If it's pushed through parse_smileys, there's no difference between what there is now and having an HTML page that has smiley symbols in it. The one difference is that we can bypass parse_bbc if we know in advance the page is pure HTML.

Nao

  • Dadman with a boy
  • Posts: 16,079
Re: Is accumulating Editor in wedge like the one in wordpress a big deal
« Reply #25, on October 6th, 2011, 03:01 PM »
Well... Actually... Now that I think about it, even if someone uses a different smiley set than the author's, it should show their own smiley set -- because Wedge uses divs with a class name, and the class name is the same in all sets... So I'm cool with that.

(Except I'm not sure anymore whether people can disable smileys at read time... In which case we'd have to do a preg_replace or something to delete smiley classes.)

Arantor

  • As powerful as possible, as complex as necessary.
  • Posts: 14,278

Nao

  • Dadman with a boy
  • Posts: 16,079

Arantor

  • As powerful as possible, as complex as necessary.
  • Posts: 14,278

godboko71

  • Fence accomplished!
  • Hello
  • Posts: 361
Thank you,
Boko