Hi Nao,
Here are the other logos I promised. You have to remember theyre concepts only and may require some additional work if need be. The blemish you refer to occurred during conversion from original artwork to an alternative format. A minor fix. I figured Id put them up as is as they were already created @ time of our discussion.
I chose slightly darker coloring to compliment the boards existing scheme particularly, as I believe a websites logo should stand out as its the first object visitors relate to before viewing content. Not to mention the fact that its representative of your collective efforts and as such should not go unnoticed. Not saying thats the case but the more eyecatching your logotype is the better it will be for you in the long run. So yeah the one years deliberation is something you'd have to go through unfortunately.
Anyway, as for concepts I deliberately kept it close to the final as mentioned. You will notice theres slightly more subtle difference in coloring in "we dge" but its still visible, I also wanted to emphasise Wedge is a forked version of SMF....as in WE and them or EDGE. And to bring it home thats what I ended up with.
As for my indulgence in "Forum" subscript, I felt a more abbreviated approach was needed and to highlight the fact that it is exactly what this site stands for..."Forum Software"...Its more balanced in terms of logo presentation and gets to the point.
Ah the font..Eras - I find it pleasing to the eye and as professional a font as Helvetica, Arial and other industry standards. As I said the following examples are concept in nature but even so clean lines is what I get out of it. A matter of preference I guess. Can posssibly be reduced to 120px in height sos to blend in a bit more. Without further adu..I present the remainder.

Here are the other logos I promised. You have to remember theyre concepts only and may require some additional work if need be. The blemish you refer to occurred during conversion from original artwork to an alternative format. A minor fix. I figured Id put them up as is as they were already created @ time of our discussion.
I chose slightly darker coloring to compliment the boards existing scheme particularly, as I believe a websites logo should stand out as its the first object visitors relate to before viewing content. Not to mention the fact that its representative of your collective efforts and as such should not go unnoticed. Not saying thats the case but the more eyecatching your logotype is the better it will be for you in the long run. So yeah the one years deliberation is something you'd have to go through unfortunately.
Anyway, as for concepts I deliberately kept it close to the final as mentioned. You will notice theres slightly more subtle difference in coloring in "we dge" but its still visible, I also wanted to emphasise Wedge is a forked version of SMF....as in WE and them or EDGE. And to bring it home thats what I ended up with.
As for my indulgence in "Forum" subscript, I felt a more abbreviated approach was needed and to highlight the fact that it is exactly what this site stands for..."Forum Software"...Its more balanced in terms of logo presentation and gets to the point.
Ah the font..Eras - I find it pleasing to the eye and as professional a font as Helvetica, Arial and other industry standards. As I said the following examples are concept in nature but even so clean lines is what I get out of it. A matter of preference I guess. Can posssibly be reduced to 120px in height sos to blend in a bit more. Without further adu..I present the remainder.

Best font for the logo..?












