Wedge

Highslide seemed like the best option when we were including it(It was your idea I think, AFAIK I was inclined to make one myself and I failed laughably) but its licensing is kind of crappy, I mean it doesn't specify that if we buy the Commercial Unlimited license and distribute highslide with a software that may or may not be used for commercial purposes, what'd happen of highslide since it doesn't stop the user of the software to take highslide from the software and use it for themselves.

I've been analyzing the features of highslide and it doesn't seem that kind of hard to code one for myself(I'm inclined to do so not only because of their crappy license, but because it is 70KB and gzips to 20KB....wut?!), only problem being draggable and droppable since jQuery's plugins for them are very beefy.

So you wanted an unlimited commercial license whereas they told you to not do that and instead let it be webmaster's responsibility? I actually prefer the latter option since you save your money(I see them billing quite a good amount since they can't be sure on how many sites your software will be used).

I ended up using highslide(Replaced jquery ui dialog and fancybox with it), I couldn't find a better alternative(My JS size remained more or less the same after gzipping and compression using google closure).

I don't know, it isn't as appealing as highslide.

The problem is I need a thumbstrip(Similar to what Highslide does) but Highslide is too fat. I plan on replacing 56KB of uncompressed JS(jQ.ui.dialog and jQ.fancybox) with whatever I find most similar and better in terms of features.

At this rate give me 2 days lol..... :eheh:

No, I meant sending a file which is closest to the user's width/height. Not resizing a overly large image in CSS(Which is done by background-size BTW).

Hopefully, yeah.