This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
406
Off-topic / Re: Bitcointalk.org $11k bounty for new forum software
« on June 10th, 2012, 09:10 AM »$11k? That's my living costs for a number of months, really. But I couldn't in good conscience accept. Not just because I find the entire idea of Bitcoins so ridiculous but because they're arguing for changes that don't really benefit anyone except in the feel-good department.
407
Plugins / Re: Monthly Statistics on Profile
« on June 10th, 2012, 08:55 AM »* Dragooon likes this.
408
Bug reports / Re: Reply post showing as 'New'
« on June 9th, 2012, 01:29 AM »I was more like saying pass it on to JavaScript for a second request, not run it with the main page load. It should be transparent.
409
Features / Re: Modify Own Post
« on June 8th, 2012, 05:36 PM »It would be nice to have the functionality that when you modify your own post in a thread that it will use AJAX in the current post instead of going to the post2 page, like the way vBulletin works.
Edit: Quickly edited
410
Bug reports / Re: Reply post showing as 'New'
« on June 8th, 2012, 05:16 PM »Can't you have both, you can do slow queries that return no information via JavaScript after the page has loaded. Would that be a good time to do clean up?
412
Off-topic / Re: Bitcointalk.org $11k bounty for new forum software
« on June 8th, 2012, 04:24 PM »
But if they can offer (and agree to, contractually) $11k, it's a pretty sweet deal. You can buy a couple of weeks of food with that.
413
Plugins / Re: Hooks for moderation actions
« on June 7th, 2012, 09:00 PM »Yeah, there's never been any need for such before. A few bits and pieces do, but nothing of any real note. I'll see what I can do.
414
Plugins / Hooks for moderation actions
« on June 7th, 2012, 08:58 PM »
I'm currently ripping apart the entire notification system and re-implementing it as an extension to the notifications core plugin, which probably won't be done until July since I'll be gone for June. And I realise that there are no hooks for many of the moderation actions such as splitting, approving, moving. It'll be useful to have these hooks.
Thanks :)
Thanks :)
415
The Pub / Re: Features
« on June 7th, 2012, 07:30 PM »Oh, yes, the calendar is removed and that's a plugin. Birthdays support on its own is a separate plugin but that the two play properly together and having both installed, you wouldn't realise it was actually two separate plugins ;)
I did say it was off the top of my head ;)
417
The Pub / Re: Features
« on June 7th, 2012, 05:11 PM »The list would be truly enormous if it were to be compiled in a single place.
418
Off-topic / Re: Help with apache2
« on June 7th, 2012, 05:08 PM »
Which processes are taking the max. amount of memory? Observe top for a while.
419
Off-topic / Will be gone for 3 weeks.
« on June 7th, 2012, 09:29 AM »
Starting Tuesday I'll be gone for 3 weeks as I'll be taking a trip to US. So you'll hardly see me and ddefinitely see no progress in my plugins. So, bye :)
420
Off-topic / Re: Help with apache2
« on June 6th, 2012, 05:44 PM »
In reply to your thought, using mod_php + apache2 in a low-memory situation is a very bad idea. Because on every new request apache forks a new child process and each child process with mod_php in SMF's case takes about 25-60 MB of RAM. And apache does this without any regards of how much of RAM is left. So I can hold F5 on any one of your site and crash your server without much trouble. Solution to this is using PHP-FPM which spawns semi-persistent processes and manages the low RAM scenarios much better. What PHP-FPM does is that it separates the php process into a separate entity instead if being bound into apache, so apache doesn't have to load php on every request even if it's non-php related. This itself saves RAM, plus FPM can restrict the number of open processes thus preventing RAM overflow. FCGI is an interface to use PHP-FPM with Apache2. I used this guide to install FCGI + PHP-FPM on an Ubuntu 12.04 server, this should be fine.
PS : I'm fairly sure what I said here is correct, but I can be wrong. Feel free to correct me in the most humiliating way possible.
EDIT: As a matter of fact, Baidu can single handily take out a website with mod_php in a low RAM situation.
PS : I'm fairly sure what I said here is correct, but I can be wrong. Feel free to correct me in the most humiliating way possible.
EDIT: As a matter of fact, Baidu can single handily take out a website with mod_php in a low RAM situation.