This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
976
Features / Re: CSS inheritance issue
« on April 15th, 2013, 12:14 AM »
Even though it's in index.member.css and declared after everything else? ;)
977
Features / Re: CSS inheritance issue
« on April 15th, 2013, 12:06 AM »
It would be hard to break anything, the grand total of CSS changes is currently:
Code: [Select]
(this way I get to alternate colours nicely)
/* And for the infraction history. Guests cannot see it.
------------------------------------------------- */
$inf_active = #cfc
$inf_expired = #f8faf8
$inf_revoked = #ffc
.windowbg.inf_active
background-color: darker($inf_active, 3%)
.windowbg.inf_expired
background-color: darker($inf_expired, 3%)
.windowbg.inf_revoked
background-color: darker($inf_revoked, 3%)
.windowbg2.inf_active
background-color: $inf_active
.windowbg2.inf_expired
background-color: $inf_expired
.windowbg2.inf_revoked
background-color: $inf_revoked(this way I get to alternate colours nicely)
978
Features / Re: CSS inheritance issue
« on April 14th, 2013, 11:43 PM »
What is the benefit compared to:
Code: [Select]
I still need to set all the colours, all the other stuff gets inherited.
If I'm honest, this is why I don't touch the style code unless I have to because it doesn't seem to matter what I do, it's at least three generations behind how you're doing it.
Removed extra button, saves even more bandwidth that way.
input.warn extends input.submit
background: url($images/warning_ban.gif) 5px center no-repeat
background-color: #fff0e3
:hover
background-color: #fff5e8I still need to set all the colours, all the other stuff gets inherited.
If I'm honest, this is why I don't touch the style code unless I have to because it doesn't seem to matter what I do, it's at least three generations behind how you're doing it.
* Arantor is tempted to remove the changes except those 'strictly' necessary, seems easier. Saves more bandwidth too.
Posted: April 14th, 2013, 10:18 PM
Removed extra button, saves even more bandwidth that way.
979
Features / Re: Miscellaneous/WIP screenshots
« on April 14th, 2013, 02:26 PM »
Yeah, there is that, but I didn't just want to have the wording on the right.
980
Features / Re: Miscellaneous/WIP screenshots
« on April 14th, 2013, 06:27 AM »
Another shot of the infractions system in action. Still WIP.
981
Archived fixes / Re: Wuthering theme misses Facebook icon
« on April 14th, 2013, 02:54 AM »
It could well be an ad-blocker. ;)
982
Features / Re: New revs
« on April 14th, 2013, 12:21 AM »
(3 files, 1KB)
Revision: 2053
Author: arantor
Date: 13 April 2013 23:20:07
Message:
! Stupid bug with a string being redeclared accidentally. (ManageBans.template.php, ManageBans language file)
----
Modified : /trunk/Themes/default/ManageBans.template.php
Modified : /trunk/Themes/default/languages/ManageBans.english.php
Modified : /trunk/Themes/default/languages/ManageBans.french.php
Revision: 2053
Author: arantor
Date: 13 April 2013 23:20:07
Message:
! Stupid bug with a string being redeclared accidentally. (ManageBans.template.php, ManageBans language file)
----
Modified : /trunk/Themes/default/ManageBans.template.php
Modified : /trunk/Themes/default/languages/ManageBans.english.php
Modified : /trunk/Themes/default/languages/ManageBans.french.php
983
Archived fixes / Re: Wuthering theme misses Facebook icon
« on April 13th, 2013, 09:46 PM »
Well, it's there for me right now in Wuthering.
If it's blocked for you, I'd wonder why your browser is blocking:
Code: [Select]
as an image reference.
(Oh, and yes, it is legal to exclude the protocol. That way you suddenly and magically become agnostic to HTTP vs HTTPS)
If it's blocked for you, I'd wonder why your browser is blocking:
//static.ak.fbcdn.net/rsrc.php/v1/yH/r/eIpbnVKI9lR.pngas an image reference.
(Oh, and yes, it is legal to exclude the protocol. That way you suddenly and magically become agnostic to HTTP vs HTTPS)
984
Plugins / [Plugin] Re: Notifications system (1.0)
« on April 13th, 2013, 04:25 PM »So, was that sarcasm..? (I'm having a Sheldon moment here.)
I'm not opposed to it, but I don't really like the idea of a Webkit only feature in the core right now.
985
Features / Re: CSS inheritance issue
« on April 13th, 2013, 03:57 PM »Still. I don't see why you're not declaring this way..?
And yes, when you put 5px center in there, there's no inheritance problem because it's explicitly redeclaring the bit that was being overridden...
This is what I was getting at, I'm well aware that in the background shorthand, it's 0 0 - except it was supposed to be inheriting from an existing one, I didn't want it to be overridden.
986
Features / Re: Miscellaneous/WIP screenshots
« on April 13th, 2013, 06:20 AM »
Just quickly, in case anyone's wondering why I need to do this page.
In the SMF days, Profile > Actions > Ban this user would merely redirect to the add ban trigger page, with some details filled in.
This time around, though, we don't have ban triggers as such, consequently we also don't have the old add trigger page, so I have to write a shiny new one. No huge deal, but it's one of the things that's been kicking around for a while that needed to happen.
@Nao, the button with icon is the new input.warn class I made. It's defined in index.member.css and I solved the issue I had by simply reincluding the same declaration for background-position into the declaration (so the new background declaration doesn't override the previously defined background-position)
In the SMF days, Profile > Actions > Ban this user would merely redirect to the add ban trigger page, with some details filled in.
This time around, though, we don't have ban triggers as such, consequently we also don't have the old add trigger page, so I have to write a shiny new one. No huge deal, but it's one of the things that's been kicking around for a while that needed to happen.
@Nao, the button with icon is the new input.warn class I made. It's defined in index.member.css and I solved the issue I had by simply reincluding the same declaration for background-position into the declaration (so the new background declaration doesn't override the previously defined background-position)
987
Features / Re: Miscellaneous/WIP screenshots
« on April 13th, 2013, 06:15 AM »
One of the things I never did when overhauling the ban system was fix up the Profile > Ban User page. Now, as mentioned I was sort of playing with it, but there still wasn't a way to actually ban a user from their profile.
Here's the WIP I have of that.
Here's the WIP I have of that.
988
Off-topic / Re: Shared Hosting Info FYI 4 all to consider.
« on April 13th, 2013, 12:02 AM »Wedge are working hard everyday to decrease the amount code
50MB and 1000 tables!
First thing that comes to mind is that they say when you sign up that you have unlimited databases and storage,
Ok unlimited DB's and storage and accounts ( Domains, )
But they should tell you these things when you sign up and not have this hidden in the terms of service and or change the terms of services after you sign up and expect you to be happy with these changes. Just saying...
Got to make serious Bucks to have a server unless you, run your own machine ( Hint).!
But they to me are not be truefull when advertising this stuff! and should be clearly stated before sign up. and you need to pray you don't get allot of visits daily! LOL
989
Features / Re: New revs - Public comments
« on April 12th, 2013, 08:33 PM »! The old Profile Notifications page is still there, but it wasn't showing up to do duplicate array entries. (Profile.php)
990
Features / Re: Mail entities and stuff.
« on April 12th, 2013, 08:23 PM »- $message is parsed only once, AFAIK, and then sent to multiple recipients (i.e. sendmail() supports multiple recipients). So I don't think there's any problem with the number of calls to PURL code...
Not to mention that sendmail can still pass its own content BACK to itself. But that's less of an issue.
- Then what should we do? Convert anchors to text..?