This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
7981
Features / Re: New revs
« on February 22nd, 2011, 03:40 PM »
Revision: 614
Author: arantor
Date: 14:39:44, 22 February 2011
Message:
! Page indexes should include previous/next links to go with pages (Subs.php)
----
Modified : /trunk/Sources/Subs.php
Author: arantor
Date: 14:39:44, 22 February 2011
Message:
! Page indexes should include previous/next links to go with pages (Subs.php)
----
Modified : /trunk/Sources/Subs.php
7982
Features / Re: New revs
« on February 22nd, 2011, 01:20 PM »
Revision: 612
Author: arantor
Date: 12:14:44, 22 February 2011
Message:
+ More bbcode icon (Class-Editor.php, sprite.png, Post.english.php)
! Fixed more bbcode to actually work, it's only just inside a topic it should be empty, all other cases it should be firing, not just when we're inside a board, like it should in feeds (install.sql, Subs-BBC.php)
+ Modified feed handler such that if we have a limit on feed length, check whether the more bbcode is present and is set within the space of that limit - if it's inside the limit, or not too far outside, use more bbc instead of auto cropping. (Feed.php)
----
Modified : /trunk/Sources/Class-Editor.php
Modified : /trunk/Sources/Feed.php
Modified : /trunk/Sources/Subs-BBC.php
Modified : /trunk/Themes/default/images/bbc/sprite.png
Modified : /trunk/Themes/default/languages/Post.english.php
Modified : /trunk/other/install.sql
Revision: 613
Author: arantor
Date: 12:19:54, 22 February 2011
Message:
! Woops, forgot to put the query quite right. (install.sql)
----
Modified : /trunk/other/install.sql
Author: arantor
Date: 12:14:44, 22 February 2011
Message:
+ More bbcode icon (Class-Editor.php, sprite.png, Post.english.php)
! Fixed more bbcode to actually work, it's only just inside a topic it should be empty, all other cases it should be firing, not just when we're inside a board, like it should in feeds (install.sql, Subs-BBC.php)
+ Modified feed handler such that if we have a limit on feed length, check whether the more bbcode is present and is set within the space of that limit - if it's inside the limit, or not too far outside, use more bbc instead of auto cropping. (Feed.php)
----
Modified : /trunk/Sources/Class-Editor.php
Modified : /trunk/Sources/Feed.php
Modified : /trunk/Sources/Subs-BBC.php
Modified : /trunk/Themes/default/images/bbc/sprite.png
Modified : /trunk/Themes/default/languages/Post.english.php
Modified : /trunk/other/install.sql
Posted: February 22nd, 2011, 01:15 PM
Revision: 613
Author: arantor
Date: 12:19:54, 22 February 2011
Message:
! Woops, forgot to put the query quite right. (install.sql)
----
Modified : /trunk/other/install.sql
7983
Features / Re: New revs
« on February 22nd, 2011, 11:23 AM »
Revision: 611
Author: arantor
Date: 10:20:21, 22 February 2011
Message:
+ Board topic order can be controlled by the database now, and there is the possibility of forcing any given board to be arranged in a particular way with no ability for user to override (install.sql, Load.php, MessageIndex.php, MessageIndex.template.php)
----
Modified : /trunk/Sources/Load.php
Modified : /trunk/Sources/MessageIndex.php
Modified : /trunk/Themes/default/MessageIndex.template.php
Modified : /trunk/other/install.sql
In other words, the functionality of the 'board sort method' mod without the admin panel option (yet) for it. Functionality is managed in the database only right now (pending ACP overhaul), where sort_method dictates what method should be used to order boards, which is the full list ('subject', 'starter', 'last_poster', 'replies', 'views', 'first_post', 'last_post') and sort_order dictates how it should be done.
natural_* indicates that it should be done as default but not forced (i.e. what happens when none is specified), forced_* indicates that this is the order to use and cannot be overridden by the user.
Author: arantor
Date: 10:20:21, 22 February 2011
Message:
+ Board topic order can be controlled by the database now, and there is the possibility of forcing any given board to be arranged in a particular way with no ability for user to override (install.sql, Load.php, MessageIndex.php, MessageIndex.template.php)
----
Modified : /trunk/Sources/Load.php
Modified : /trunk/Sources/MessageIndex.php
Modified : /trunk/Themes/default/MessageIndex.template.php
Modified : /trunk/other/install.sql
In other words, the functionality of the 'board sort method' mod without the admin panel option (yet) for it. Functionality is managed in the database only right now (pending ACP overhaul), where sort_method dictates what method should be used to order boards, which is the full list ('subject', 'starter', 'last_poster', 'replies', 'views', 'first_post', 'last_post') and sort_order dictates how it should be done.
natural_* indicates that it should be done as default but not forced (i.e. what happens when none is specified), forced_* indicates that this is the order to use and cannot be overridden by the user.
7984
Features / Re: New revs
« on February 22nd, 2011, 03:21 AM »
Revision: 610
Author: arantor
Date: 02:20:38, 22 February 2011
Message:
! Make sure board type is available to the board loader (Load.php)
! Refactor the code for getting who is in a board/topic for display, reducing duplicate code (MessageIndex.php, Display.php, Subs-MembersOnline.php)
----
Modified : /trunk/Sources/Display.php
Modified : /trunk/Sources/Load.php
Modified : /trunk/Sources/MessageIndex.php
Modified : /trunk/Sources/Subs-MembersOnline.php
Author: arantor
Date: 02:20:38, 22 February 2011
Message:
! Make sure board type is available to the board loader (Load.php)
! Refactor the code for getting who is in a board/topic for display, reducing duplicate code (MessageIndex.php, Display.php, Subs-MembersOnline.php)
----
Modified : /trunk/Sources/Display.php
Modified : /trunk/Sources/Load.php
Modified : /trunk/Sources/MessageIndex.php
Modified : /trunk/Sources/Subs-MembersOnline.php
7985
Off-topic / Re: SQL injection to traffic cameras
« on February 20th, 2011, 03:27 PM »
Bwhahahahahaha :lol: :niark:
Serves 'em right!
Serves 'em right!
7986
Other software / Re: Looking for Portal Suggestions
« on February 19th, 2011, 05:43 PM »
The one thing that hits me about each of the portals is how much *stuff* there is. I did look at all the portals a bit back, and it struck me how thorough some of the admin panels are for them, but too much *stuff* in one place and a sort of reliance on users figuring it out themselves.
PMX exemplifies that in my mind, both SP and TP have the same issue but at least they're easy enough to follow once you've been around a bit (as it were)
Neither PMX nor ezP focus on design too much, they come across as blocky and built by programmers almost for their own use rather than for others. (Perhaps I'm giving our friend too much credit here, don't know. At least, I *hope* that's the reason for ezP's design mentality.)
ADK Portal seems a bit much of a mish-mash, as though it doesn't really know what it's trying to do.
DP, I did some debugging in the run up to 1.0, and its drag and drop ideas were pretty nice, but it did feel a bit like it was trying to chase SP at times, and not for the right reasons.
PMX exemplifies that in my mind, both SP and TP have the same issue but at least they're easy enough to follow once you've been around a bit (as it were)
Neither PMX nor ezP focus on design too much, they come across as blocky and built by programmers almost for their own use rather than for others. (Perhaps I'm giving our friend too much credit here, don't know. At least, I *hope* that's the reason for ezP's design mentality.)
ADK Portal seems a bit much of a mish-mash, as though it doesn't really know what it's trying to do.
DP, I did some debugging in the run up to 1.0, and its drag and drop ideas were pretty nice, but it did feel a bit like it was trying to chase SP at times, and not for the right reasons.
7987
Other software / Re: Looking for Portal Suggestions
« on February 19th, 2011, 04:33 PM »Personally I say Simple Portal, it is alot better than PortaMX in every aspect.
7988
Features / Re: New revs
« on February 19th, 2011, 12:55 PM »
Revision: 604
Author: arantor
Date: 11:54:58, 19 February 2011
Message:
! Sync to Bad Behavior 2.1.11
! Remove test for Google Wireless in anti-Google spoof as it is a special proxy not a search engine. (Security.php)
! Sync to SMF 10465
! (r10449) Cache bug in upgrader (upgrade.php)
! (r10466) Typo in forum profile loader, makes custom fields more internally consistent (Profile-Modify.php)
! (r10467) 64-bit created zip file decompression fix (Subs-Package.php)
Not implemented from SMF
* r10447 Tweak of censored words UI (going to be rewritten anyway)
* r10448 Shuffling of setlocale and time format in 2.1 branch, not convinced it is beneficial yet, and not convinced it doesn't have issues (it certianly has some issues in the hacky changes to Load.php if mb_* functions aren't available... like fatal errors)
* r10450,10457-10459 Tagging 1.0.21, 1.1.13, 2.0 RC5, branching in 2.1/other
* r10451 Pedantry and minor typo fix in converter (not applicable to us because the importer needs to be written from scratch anyway)
* r10452 Conversions of substr($x, $y, 1) to $x[$y]... it makes it harder to follow and the speed factor is not hugely significant even if it is inside parse_bbc (it's *where* it's inside parse_bbc, in validate functions mostly)
* r10453 Pedantry: removal of @ in front of ini_get/ini_set and ob_start calls
* r10454 Many tiny changes of == to === and rewrites of substr($x, $y, 1) to $x[$y] as well as substr($x, 0 $y) == $z becoming strpos($z, $x) === 0 - doesn't help readability and mostly it's run in places that don't impact performance too much (and is 2.1)
* r10455 Removal of @ in front of set memory limit calls in converters
* r10456 More == to === conversions
* r10460 Yet more == to === in Post.php for 'testing commits'
* r10461-3 Converting TYPE to ENGINE in upgrader scripts, then reverting it
* r10464 Many tiny changes of == to === and rewrites of substr($x, $y, 1) to $x[$y] as well as substr($x, 0 $y) == $z becoming strpos($z, $x) === 0 - doesn't help readability and mostly it's run in places that don't impact performance too much (and is 2.1)
* r10465 Changing the 'clean attachment' to 'clear attachment' - we already revised the UI entirely
* r10468 PostgreSQL specific fix in upgrader.
* r10469 [2.1] "Replaced some strtr with str_replace and some strpos(strtolower()) with stripos() and some strtolower() == strtolower() with strcasecmp(). Just pedantic stuff."
----
Modified : /trunk/Sources/Profile-Modify.php
Modified : /trunk/Sources/Security.php
Modified : /trunk/Sources/Subs-Package.php
Modified : /trunk/other/upgrade.php
Author: arantor
Date: 11:54:58, 19 February 2011
Message:
! Sync to Bad Behavior 2.1.11
! Remove test for Google Wireless in anti-Google spoof as it is a special proxy not a search engine. (Security.php)
! Sync to SMF 10465
! (r10449) Cache bug in upgrader (upgrade.php)
! (r10466) Typo in forum profile loader, makes custom fields more internally consistent (Profile-Modify.php)
! (r10467) 64-bit created zip file decompression fix (Subs-Package.php)
Not implemented from SMF
* r10447 Tweak of censored words UI (going to be rewritten anyway)
* r10448 Shuffling of setlocale and time format in 2.1 branch, not convinced it is beneficial yet, and not convinced it doesn't have issues (it certianly has some issues in the hacky changes to Load.php if mb_* functions aren't available... like fatal errors)
* r10450,10457-10459 Tagging 1.0.21, 1.1.13, 2.0 RC5, branching in 2.1/other
* r10451 Pedantry and minor typo fix in converter (not applicable to us because the importer needs to be written from scratch anyway)
* r10452 Conversions of substr($x, $y, 1) to $x[$y]... it makes it harder to follow and the speed factor is not hugely significant even if it is inside parse_bbc (it's *where* it's inside parse_bbc, in validate functions mostly)
* r10453 Pedantry: removal of @ in front of ini_get/ini_set and ob_start calls
* r10454 Many tiny changes of == to === and rewrites of substr($x, $y, 1) to $x[$y] as well as substr($x, 0 $y) == $z becoming strpos($z, $x) === 0 - doesn't help readability and mostly it's run in places that don't impact performance too much (and is 2.1)
* r10455 Removal of @ in front of set memory limit calls in converters
* r10456 More == to === conversions
* r10460 Yet more == to === in Post.php for 'testing commits'
* r10461-3 Converting TYPE to ENGINE in upgrader scripts, then reverting it
* r10464 Many tiny changes of == to === and rewrites of substr($x, $y, 1) to $x[$y] as well as substr($x, 0 $y) == $z becoming strpos($z, $x) === 0 - doesn't help readability and mostly it's run in places that don't impact performance too much (and is 2.1)
* r10465 Changing the 'clean attachment' to 'clear attachment' - we already revised the UI entirely
* r10468 PostgreSQL specific fix in upgrader.
* r10469 [2.1] "Replaced some strtr with str_replace and some strpos(strtolower()) with stripos() and some strtolower() == strtolower() with strcasecmp(). Just pedantic stuff."
----
Modified : /trunk/Sources/Profile-Modify.php
Modified : /trunk/Sources/Security.php
Modified : /trunk/Sources/Subs-Package.php
Modified : /trunk/other/upgrade.php
7989
Other software / Re: Looking for Portal Suggestions
« on February 18th, 2011, 07:54 PM »
I don't use any of the current portals but from everything I've heard, SimplePortal is the most stable and reliable. (That's based on what I've heard, TinyPortal is pretty good too but more complex to use, the others I don't have a lot of knowledge about)
As for exactly what features we plan to have... it's still in flux really.
As for exactly what features we plan to have... it's still in flux really.
7990
Features / Re: Recycling board by default (PLEASE READ THE FEB. 15 POSTS EVERYONE!)
« on February 17th, 2011, 11:51 PM »We'd need to check it everytime because we'll probably use is_approved to store the state (unapproved/approved/deleted).
I'd hate to restore something that was pending moderation and find it was auto approved in the process.
I'm seriously debating making post moderation permanently enabled rather than optional - I hear the concerns over performance but I have a feeling we can do something about that too. If it's handling deletion, it must be, basically.
Still not?
Topics also have a is_approved flag IIRC. (Or they use the one for the very first post. Either way, it shouldn't be a performance issue to have this.)
And then fix up the hellspawn that is the moderation center (or should we gut that and do something better?)
7991
Features / Re: Recycling board by default (PLEASE READ THE FEB. 15 POSTS EVERYONE!)
« on February 17th, 2011, 10:28 PM »So... Do we agree on getting rid of the recycle bin? Or do you want to keep it (just not with a recycle board added by default...)
Permdel: do you mean alongside the regular Delete button, or as replacement for the Delete button when the post is in Deleted mode? Second one, right?
Did you have a look at my WarmWine BTW?
Posted: February 17th, 2011, 05:18 PM
Also, how do we display a deleted topic?
7992
Features / Re: Recycling board by default (PLEASE READ THE FEB. 15 POSTS EVERYONE!)
« on February 17th, 2011, 12:27 PM »
Yeah, I'd like that. Not only does it keep consistency in pages, it also provides some consistency to the discussion, I don't know how many times I saw discussions that got altered because a post was removed, changing how the remaining posts were read.
NB there should still be a permadelete that actually deletes posts too...
NB there should still be a permadelete that actually deletes posts too...
7993
Features / Re: Recycling board by default (PLEASE READ THE FEB. 15 POSTS EVERYONE!)
« on February 17th, 2011, 12:16 PM »
OK, I'll buy that. (Then it's the themers' problem if they don't keep the style :niark:)
What we should do is mock up how it looks doing inline deletion that way (how XF does it, collapsing it down to a limited space rather than showing the full post, while moderated can show the full post)
What we should do is mock up how it looks doing inline deletion that way (how XF does it, collapsing it down to a limited space rather than showing the full post, while moderated can show the full post)
7994
Features / Re: Recycling board by default (PLEASE READ THE FEB. 15 POSTS EVERYONE!)
« on February 17th, 2011, 11:44 AM »
That's what happens with posts from people you have on your ignore list. You get their name, no avatar, no poster info and the entire message is replaced with 'You are ignoring this person, click here to see what they said'.
Hence my concern because it looks pretty similar to inline deletion with what's been proposed.
Hence my concern because it looks pretty similar to inline deletion with what's been proposed.
7995
Features / Re: New revs
« on February 17th, 2011, 03:33 AM »
Revision: 600
Author: arantor
Date: 02:33:06, 17 February 2011
Message:
! Reinstate proxy handling for IPv6. Still needs more testing and match_cidr to be rewritten for IPv6 though. (QueryString.php)
----
Modified : /trunk/Sources/QueryString.php
Author: arantor
Date: 02:33:06, 17 February 2011
Message:
! Reinstate proxy handling for IPv6. Still needs more testing and match_cidr to be rewritten for IPv6 though. (QueryString.php)
----
Modified : /trunk/Sources/QueryString.php