Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Arantor
6916
Other software / Re: "Paid for" shit.
« on July 28th, 2011, 09:12 AM »
Runic, if someone changed the password and the email address for an account, that would make it impossible to log in and to retrieve the password. And I suspect the changes wouldn't be logged in the profile change log either (I can't remember if it's turned on or not, and even if it is, it actually doesn't log everything anyway)

Also note that in a default setup, a global mod does have permission to make the requisite changes, IIRC.
6917
Other software / Re: "Paid for" shit.
« on July 28th, 2011, 12:35 AM »
I've seen some shitty behaviour in my time but the more this goes on the more fucking ridiculous it gets. :(
6918
Off-topic / Re: The Oatmeal
« on July 27th, 2011, 08:42 PM »
This wasn't a win, this was pure pwnage.
6919
Other software / Re: "Paid for" shit.
« on July 27th, 2011, 08:09 PM »
I thought the permissions had been altered on sm.org but if they are doing that, that's ridiculous and beyond an abuse of power.
6920
Other software / Re: "Paid for" shit.
« on July 27th, 2011, 07:12 PM »
Quote
One simple disagreement in a support topic and then no longer able to log in. Either the "lower ranking" one I had an issue with has access to alter accounts or he has a very good friend at SMF that does.
Hmm. I understood that the team leads were able to modify accounts to the point of being able to alter groups (for SHOTM for example) but that there is something else at work.

Mind you, something to chew on: I was briefly involved with one of the efforts to work on the Cust site. And in doing that, I had access to FTP for the site and potential database access - so perhaps there is something amiss there...
6921
Other software / Re: "Paid for" shit.
« on July 27th, 2011, 06:53 PM »
Quote
Well as you know, I can no longer log into my account at SMF due to one simple disagreement with a "Customizer" so I guess it's not my problem anymore either.
Interesting. IIRC that would entail you actually receiving a full ban which only the admins can set up - unless things have drastically changed, none of the lower ranks actually have that power. But that signals an interesting change to the dynamics, because no-one was ever banned (other than post bans, which is a separate thing) in years except for being a spammer.[1]
 1. Specifically the last person I understood to have received a full ban was ccbtimewiz. Yeah, don't go there. Oh, and me, at one point as a last-ditch attempt to keep me instead of account deletion of my original account last summer. But that's it.
6922
Other software / Re: "Paid for" shit.
« on July 27th, 2011, 05:42 PM »
Quote
Some people think that you owe them something simply because they are using your product and have no problems displaying their tempers.
This was what drove me up the wall so much, along with people who apparently can't read the description put in front of them in more than one place.

Actually, the team boards themselves weren't too bad, but the friends board... ouch. Still, not my problem any more. I just feel sad thinking about what it might have been instead of what it became.
6923
Other software / Re: "Paid for" shit.
« on July 27th, 2011, 05:22 PM »
Quote
support for the product may not be an obligation but should be offered at no cost out of respect for the user
This is one of the things that usually trips my anger trigger. I have no problem offering support out of respect - when I get that respect in the first place; all the mods I published on sm.org got support until I gave them away. When people cross the line from asking for support to expecting it, especially in cases where it was made clear that it was given away 'as is', then I lose my temper about it - there are plenty of people who don't seem to understand what 'no support' means, and still ask or even demand it as though they think they're entitled to it.[1]
Quote
In short, no customer should ever be obligated to pay for support for any default program.
The way I played arantormods.com was that out of a sense of community, I did actually charge for support. The way I looked at it, if I was helping one person instead of writing something for lots of people, I'd rather that that one person understood that they were getting priority and I felt that they should be prepared to put something of their own in too.
Quote
One of SMF's big problems today is allowing the general support staff to moderate and on many occasions it has proven to be nothing but trouble.
You've only seen part of it. Imagine a board that is only accessible by the team and former team members - and the former team members don't have moderation powers, but the team does. Now imagine it's not a friendly board but at times akin to a warzone... Been there, done that.
 1. This happened at arantormods.com and has happened on Noisen even in reply to a thread entitled 'No support!'
6924
Development blog / Re: Now with 97% more visuals!
« on July 26th, 2011, 02:42 PM »
Ah, alternating it between left/right on each post (left on one post, right on the next)

Interesting idea, can't see it being useful on most forums though.
6925
Other software / Re: Wedge and SMF directions
« on July 26th, 2011, 01:57 PM »
Everyone likes to receive compliments about themselves now and again, especially when they're deserved.
6926
Features / Re: Blogging features
« on July 26th, 2011, 01:50 PM »
Quote
ask the same goddamn questions regarding whether Wedge will have SEO because it won't, not ever.
No, that's not what's been said.

Wedge will include some of the 'SEO tricks' but only because I'm that pissed off with people asking for things that they think will help that I'm prepared to implement them just to make people STFU.
6927
Off-topic / Re: Doctor Who
« on July 26th, 2011, 01:21 PM »
Have to say The Lodger was not one of my favourite episodes from season 5. Not bad, just not that good either.
6928
Features / Re: Blogging features
« on July 26th, 2011, 12:31 AM »
Quote
I have read and heard, that Full SEO URLs help the page rank indexing in Google.
Hasn't been true in years, sory.
Quote
Well, hopefully you will have some MOD authors,
that will code the missing MODs then.
Yes, I expect to write some mods too. Fortunately, I'm also planning on making the mod system more rugged.
Quote
Maybe Feline will make a portal for it,
if you don´t laugh at her red hair anymore ??
I never laughed at her, except at her ridiculous demands after we invited her.
6929
Features / Re: Blogging features
« on July 26th, 2011, 12:11 AM »
Dear God, please let's not have this debate again, since I swear nothing has changed in months since I last answered these questions for you.
Quote
full SEO SEF compatible URLs is a must today.
No it isn't. I swear I've told you this multiple times that it isn't 'a must'. It IS however implemented because it makes the URLs look nice, but search engines are more than capable of managing to get content with dynamic URLs. Hell, they can even manage JavaScript based URLs now if the URL is formatted correctly. It was important YEARS ago.
Quote
So what about a Portal ?
Will this be integrated ?
There is a sidebar. It has some content. We aren't exactly planning on building a full portal in, mostly because as stated many many times, we're building primarily what we want to build, and hopefully that'll fit in with what other people want. You, however, I already know are more demanding than most having already answered this question specifically for you - and other questions like it - on Noisen.
Quote
Will you have any feature like the AdMod or simular,
so we can put ads between postings ?
Don't make me find the post where I already answered this for you on Noisen. Survey says probably not, just like I said months ago. And please don't try and tell me it's a "requirement", plenty of sites run just fine without ads.


:edit: There are many more important things to be working on than crap like these things.
6930
Features / Re: New revs
« on July 25th, 2011, 09:29 PM »
Revision: 892
Author: arantor
Date: 20:27:35, 25 July 2011
Message:
! First use of the proposed number_context function to aid in i18n of language strings. I've applied it to the board index and message index for the number of posts, topics and redirections for each board, with an appropriate 'No topics' type string for 0, which just looks nicer to me. (Subs.php, BoardIndex.template.php, MessageIndex.template.php, index.english.php)
----
Modified : /trunk/Sources/Subs.php
Modified : /trunk/Themes/default/BoardIndex.template.php
Modified : /trunk/Themes/default/MessageIndex.template.php
Modified : /trunk/Themes/default/languages/index.english.php


Yup. I finally implemented this sucker. It is a touch more elaborate than my original - because it also calls on comma_format while it's at it, meaning the language string has to have a %s in the right place for the numbers. But there are examples of this now!!