This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
6916
Other software / Re: "Paid for" shit.
« on July 28th, 2011, 09:12 AM »
Runic, if someone changed the password and the email address for an account, that would make it impossible to log in and to retrieve the password. And I suspect the changes wouldn't be logged in the profile change log either (I can't remember if it's turned on or not, and even if it is, it actually doesn't log everything anyway)
Also note that in a default setup, a global mod does have permission to make the requisite changes, IIRC.
Also note that in a default setup, a global mod does have permission to make the requisite changes, IIRC.
6917
Other software / Re: "Paid for" shit.
« on July 28th, 2011, 12:35 AM »
I've seen some shitty behaviour in my time but the more this goes on the more fucking ridiculous it gets. :(
6918
Off-topic / Re: The Oatmeal
« on July 27th, 2011, 08:42 PM »
This wasn't a win, this was pure pwnage.
6919
Other software / Re: "Paid for" shit.
« on July 27th, 2011, 08:09 PM »
I thought the permissions had been altered on sm.org but if they are doing that, that's ridiculous and beyond an abuse of power.
6920
Other software / Re: "Paid for" shit.
« on July 27th, 2011, 07:12 PM »One simple disagreement in a support topic and then no longer able to log in. Either the "lower ranking" one I had an issue with has access to alter accounts or he has a very good friend at SMF that does.
Mind you, something to chew on: I was briefly involved with one of the efforts to work on the Cust site. And in doing that, I had access to FTP for the site and potential database access - so perhaps there is something amiss there...
6921
Other software / Re: "Paid for" shit.
« on July 27th, 2011, 06:53 PM »Well as you know, I can no longer log into my account at SMF due to one simple disagreement with a "Customizer" so I guess it's not my problem anymore either.
| 1. | Specifically the last person I understood to have received a full ban was ccbtimewiz. Yeah, don't go there. Oh, and me, at one point as a last-ditch attempt to keep me instead of account deletion of my original account last summer. But that's it. |
6922
Other software / Re: "Paid for" shit.
« on July 27th, 2011, 05:42 PM »Some people think that you owe them something simply because they are using your product and have no problems displaying their tempers.
Actually, the team boards themselves weren't too bad, but the friends board... ouch. Still, not my problem any more. I just feel sad thinking about what it might have been instead of what it became.
6923
Other software / Re: "Paid for" shit.
« on July 27th, 2011, 05:22 PM »support for the product may not be an obligation but should be offered at no cost out of respect for the user
In short, no customer should ever be obligated to pay for support for any default program.
One of SMF's big problems today is allowing the general support staff to moderate and on many occasions it has proven to be nothing but trouble.
| 1. | This happened at arantormods.com and has happened on Noisen even in reply to a thread entitled 'No support!' |
6924
Development blog / Re: Now with 97% more visuals!
« on July 26th, 2011, 02:42 PM »
Ah, alternating it between left/right on each post (left on one post, right on the next)
Interesting idea, can't see it being useful on most forums though.
Interesting idea, can't see it being useful on most forums though.
6925
Other software / Re: Wedge and SMF directions
« on July 26th, 2011, 01:57 PM »
Everyone likes to receive compliments about themselves now and again, especially when they're deserved.
6926
Features / Re: Blogging features
« on July 26th, 2011, 01:50 PM »ask the same goddamn questions regarding whether Wedge will have SEO because it won't, not ever.
Wedge will include some of the 'SEO tricks' but only because I'm that pissed off with people asking for things that they think will help that I'm prepared to implement them just to make people STFU.
6927
Off-topic / Re: Doctor Who
« on July 26th, 2011, 01:21 PM »
Have to say The Lodger was not one of my favourite episodes from season 5. Not bad, just not that good either.
6928
Features / Re: Blogging features
« on July 26th, 2011, 12:31 AM »I have read and heard, that Full SEO URLs help the page rank indexing in Google.
Well, hopefully you will have some MOD authors,
that will code the missing MODs then.
Maybe Feline will make a portal for it,
if you don´t laugh at her red hair anymore ??
6929
Features / Re: Blogging features
« on July 26th, 2011, 12:11 AM »
Dear God, please let's not have this debate again, since I swear nothing has changed in months since I last answered these questions for you.Quote No it isn't. I swear I've told you this multiple times that it isn't 'a must'. It IS however implemented because it makes the URLs look nice, but search engines are more than capable of managing to get content with dynamic URLs. Hell, they can even manage JavaScript based URLs now if the URL is formatted correctly. It was important YEARS ago.Quote There is a sidebar. It has some content. We aren't exactly planning on building a full portal in, mostly because as stated many many times, we're building primarily what we want to build, and hopefully that'll fit in with what other people want. You, however, I already know are more demanding than most having already answered this question specifically for you - and other questions like it - on Noisen.Quote Don't make me find the post where I already answered this for you on Noisen. Survey says probably not, just like I said months ago. And please don't try and tell me it's a "requirement", plenty of sites run just fine without ads.
:edit: There are many more important things to be working on than crap like these things.
full SEO SEF compatible URLs is a must today.
So what about a Portal ?
Will this be integrated ?
Will you have any feature like the AdMod or simular,
so we can put ads between postings ?
:edit: There are many more important things to be working on than crap like these things.
6930
Features / Re: New revs
« on July 25th, 2011, 09:29 PM »
Revision: 892
Author: arantor
Date: 20:27:35, 25 July 2011
Message:
! First use of the proposed number_context function to aid in i18n of language strings. I've applied it to the board index and message index for the number of posts, topics and redirections for each board, with an appropriate 'No topics' type string for 0, which just looks nicer to me. (Subs.php, BoardIndex.template.php, MessageIndex.template.php, index.english.php)
----
Modified : /trunk/Sources/Subs.php
Modified : /trunk/Themes/default/BoardIndex.template.php
Modified : /trunk/Themes/default/MessageIndex.template.php
Modified : /trunk/Themes/default/languages/index.english.php
Yup. I finally implemented this sucker. It is a touch more elaborate than my original - because it also calls on comma_format while it's at it, meaning the language string has to have a %s in the right place for the numbers. But there are examples of this now!!
Author: arantor
Date: 20:27:35, 25 July 2011
Message:
! First use of the proposed number_context function to aid in i18n of language strings. I've applied it to the board index and message index for the number of posts, topics and redirections for each board, with an appropriate 'No topics' type string for 0, which just looks nicer to me. (Subs.php, BoardIndex.template.php, MessageIndex.template.php, index.english.php)
----
Modified : /trunk/Sources/Subs.php
Modified : /trunk/Themes/default/BoardIndex.template.php
Modified : /trunk/Themes/default/MessageIndex.template.php
Modified : /trunk/Themes/default/languages/index.english.php
Yup. I finally implemented this sucker. It is a touch more elaborate than my original - because it also calls on comma_format while it's at it, meaning the language string has to have a %s in the right place for the numbers. But there are examples of this now!!