Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Arantor
5731
Off-topic / Re: Google Galaxy Nexus
« on October 25th, 2011, 01:58 AM »
Quote
The Galaxy Nexus is straight from Google so it doesn't have that problem with crapware, AFAIK.
Hmm, I thought the Galaxy range were Samsung devices? I didn't realise Google built any of their own hardware...
Quote
Also Google has only had to hit the "killswitch" for apps a handful of times.when malicious apps have made their way into the Market.
That's all well and good for things in the main Android market. Unlike iOS where such things are pretty limited by nature and design, there are quite a few Android markets, with varying degrees of policing and quality. I have in particular heard horror stories about Amazon's app marketplace policies.
Quote
I'm not an artist nor have I taken any classes in art so I may be getting the terms incorrect, but hopefully you'll get what I mean.
If we understand what you're trying to get at, does it matter that the terms aren't necessarily correct? I understand the meaning you're trying to convey, which is enough for me :)
Quote
Basically, what I'm trying to say is that iOS is very static, updates don't change the look and feel of it much but it's still a very solid product.
Jobs and co have always been fond of the notion that form follows function, and for the most part that's quite accurate in my experience.
Quote
Android has more freedom when it comes to updates, which makes me excited whenever a new major version is coming out because I'm curious to see what they've come up with next.
On the flip side, there are problems inherent in that model. I don't want to have to go rummage through what's changed potentially every update. Even I as a developer like things to be where I left them, working how I expect them to.

Having more freedom doesn't implicitly demand or expect it to be used.

It's a tough call, and remember that while individual operators can get away with pushing their own variant if they choose, Apple can't because of the precedent it has set itself, of which consistency is amongst those things. Sure, things change between releases but for the most part, things are exactly where I left them, which is much easier on me as a user, and Apple considers the overall user experience pretty highly.
5732
Off-topic / Re: Google Galaxy Nexus
« on October 24th, 2011, 10:16 PM »
Quote from Dragooon on October 24th, 2011, 10:12 PM
That's not what the topic was about, plus I don't got a Mac so I can't really "enjoy" iPhone development.
I know... My point was that if you make it more customisable for the user, it's harder for app devs to make things actually work properly, which is the source of a good many comments I've heard about poor compatibility on Android.
5733
Off-topic / Re: Google Galaxy Nexus
« on October 24th, 2011, 10:04 PM »
Freedom for one group implies constrictions on others, user freedom does curb developer freedom and vice versa...
5734
Plugins / Re: Quick little plugin
« on October 24th, 2011, 09:24 PM »
It will, but each person that gets it has a chance of being educated, which is better than no chance at all - there, it relies on people finding the tip and reading the whole thread.

Also, I find it interesting to note that he's copied that from DynamicDrive without the credit...
5735
Off-topic / Re: Google Galaxy Nexus
« on October 24th, 2011, 08:00 PM »
I don't like Android as a development target. Some of the different markets have interesting approaches like not properly indicating whether a given device can run an app (though it's the ecosystem, not the OS itself)

Primarily, though, I don't like the fact that the device ecosystem is so fragmented, that the above limitation becomes quite significant - while for iOS the number of hardware models is pretty slim all told, there are quite literally hundreds of models out there for Android, and it's almost as bad as Windows for compatibility.

The other matter is how vendors have a really bad habit of not shipping updates to Android, there are plenty of devices that can run later Android versions yet the operator hasn't provided updates. While, theoretically, users can root their device to get updates, they shouldn't have to do so and the fact that the OS encourages this is bad to me.
5736
Off-topic / Re: Doctor Who
« on October 24th, 2011, 04:44 PM »
In answer to the 15 unanswered questions that Aaron posted a link to... (my theories)

(click to show/hide)
So, why go to the trouble of putting River in the lake?

A sense of drama, plus the fact that the Silents/Silence love the whole notion of being hidden, and a lake would be a pretty good way to hide someone. Plus it's also a pretty direct reference to the whole Silence Will Fall idea since what River emerges out of the lake - Lake Silence.

It is a bit odd but less ridiculous than the plans that James Bond regularly has to deal with.

Speaking of the incident at Lake Silencio, did it really take the Doctor 200 years to come up with that escape plan?

As mentioned, he went out and about, sightseeing, staring back at Amy and Rory through history. The other thing is, the Doctor is of the understanding that it's a fixed point in time and space, and he's seen first hand what happens if he manipulates fixed points, it goes horribly awry. It isn't, then, quite so obvious that he can get out of it.

What was going on with those photos of a happy Amy and baby Melody?

Given that it's the Ganger Amy seeing those, I wouldn't be at all surprised if that's hopeful images of the future as indicated in the article. Only natural that you should visualise such things subconsciously.

How does drawing tally marks on your face help? Surely that’s an awkward place to mark yourself? You’d need to carry a mirror around with you at all times.

If you run out of places on your arms, face is the nearest bit of exposed skin. Mind you, it also has the benefit of looking dramatic, and will remind your friends that something is wrong.

What’s going on with Madame Kovarian?

Well, the article points out that the aborted timeline has her dead (but the entire timeline is aborted, so that's pretty much irrelevant anyway, though a better question would be how she's at that 'time' and 'place' in the aborted timeline, but I guess if the entirety of time and space is happening at once, it's possible)

But yeah, she's probably living it up thinking that she's killed the Doctor, though something like that we're going to see again, I'm sure.

What was that Season 6B teaser all about?

It looked good, no? I think it was reflecting on the notion that the Doctor is going to die soon, and the fading of the sonic screwdriver's light was reflective of hope fading.

How are Dorium and those skulls still alive?

How are the Headless Monks still alive? It's the 51st Century, it's not inconceivable that they imbue the skulls with some sense of life after they'd died. Voodoo curse, maybe. It's no more ridiculous than animated skeletons or zombies...

Are the Doctor and River married now?

Well... the main issue seems to be that the Teselecta was the one that married River - but the Doctor was inside the Teselecta so I think we'd stretch a point on that one personally, but the marriage wouldn't be recognised in any court of law :P That said, in any way that makes meaningful sense for the two of them, they're married now.

Whatever happened to the Evil League of Evil?

With the risk to the Universe gone, they could suitably disband and not worry about things, so they return to their usual sense of domination.

Speaking of monsters, what’s up with the Cybermen?

The lack of Cybus logo indicates that they're not from the parallel universe but from the current one, and it's likely that the Cyberconverter at Canary Wharf (which got moved to the Hub) wasn't the only one. While the rest may not have been too functional, the designs would still be kicking about and likely worth some cash to the right person... there's a bunch of ways to explain this one.

What’s going on with the other timeship from “The Lodger”?

Yeah, I never really understood this. I get the impression that the ship crashed and was forever after a pilot, but that the one in 1969 was a separate ship, probably one the Silents had stolen, perhaps even the ship they used to get to Earth in the first place, and since partly repaired/rebuilt? I don't know.

So who blew up the TARDIS in “The Big Bang”?

The only way I can reconcile that is it being the previous attempt to rid the universe of the Doctor by the Silents: trap the mad man in a box that he can't escape and destroy his time machine. Except it had a consequence they didn't realise and he ended up saving the day. Hence the need to drag in Madame Kovarian.

Now we come to mention it, what exactly is The Silence?

Ahhh, yes. This one's tricky. There are three of them. There's the Silents, the religious order, and there's the whole notion of 'Silence will fall'. This later one is actually two: Silence will fall when the question is asked, presumably meaning a whole sense of universal apocalypse where nothing is left, and the Doctor's silence prior to that because he knows the answer and must not say it in order to avert the disaster at Trenzalor.

What is the question?

Well, I initially fell into the trap of thinking it was literal, but it won't be. The answer is we don't know the question, in a leap of Douglas Adamsian propositions, and the rest of the wording sets up for the best installment of the title gag yet.

And finally, and most crucially… why was there a duck pond with no ducks in “The Eleventh Hour”?

If there's no ducks, how do you know it's a duck pond? The idea here is that things have been removed from reality and you can't explain it but you know it's missing because the surrounding context is there. As in... it's a duck pond sans ducks but you know it's a duck pond.

Then of course we have the greatest play on words with it - Amy *Pond*. The duck pond is a simile of her life. She knows who she is, she remembers for example her childhood but she can't remember her parents. She knows she must have had them, but they're not there and they should be.
5737
Plugins / Re: Using permissions in plugins
« on October 24th, 2011, 03:09 PM »
Interesting idea, I hadn't actually considered going that far.

Of course the argument I presented above against my own POV gets clobbered even more: create a new group and you then have to update its permissions in a whole bunch of places rather than a few (or one, on an unmodified, unexpanded forum)

Also that would require expanding things in places that currently don't have GUIs for them - for example viewing Who's Online only has an option or two buried elsewhere in the admin panel, though it only has one permission attached. Same deal with the member list.

Board level permissions are a bit trickier, due to the fact it isn't only permissions in that board, but it's permissions in that board by user group (though, arguably, no different to what would happen if pushed totally into the plugin's area to cope with)
5738
Off-topic / Re: Doctor Who
« on October 24th, 2011, 09:46 AM »
Quote
The Dalek episode works well to introduce daleks to Who newbies, which I was part of, obviously.
Yeah, my partner takes the same view.
Quote
First 1963 episode was too boring, and City of Death started too campy for my taste...)
It was a whole different generation of TV watching - remember, you'd tune in every week for another 25 minute segment.
Quote
I have yet to see a *complete* episode of the original show. First 1963 episode was too boring, and City of Death started too campy for my taste...
I think you have to be a bit choosier about the earlier ones if you're coming to it from being a New Who fan, as it were - some of the older stuff hasn't held up well at all, and especially the oldest stuff.

You might try Tom Baker (4th Doctor) first, I'm sure you'll see some of the similarities to Tennant. Specifically, for a first viewing, try either The Pyramids of Mars or The Robots of Death which are quite good all-rounders (and TPoM has a rather younger, more naive Sarah Jane Smith in, so it's not like you have to be mystified as to who the companion is or where they came from)

The other thing to remember is that back then, while there were 'seasons', they weren't seasons in the way you and I would consider them today - a season was essentially a collection of 6 or so narratives, each of which was 4-6 25 minute episodes, meaning that a season was most of a year's worth of shows.
5739
Plugins / Re: Using permissions in plugins
« on October 24th, 2011, 09:46 AM »
Quote
Okay, that does sound kind of logical to me. How about adding links to those areas in the actual permissions tab? So that users looking for permissions can go there directly.
OK, I don't think I'm making myself clear here. Why would I add a link from a plugin to the permissions area when for a similar amount of effort, I can *just put the permissions in the plugin area*? Unless you're talking about a link from the main plugins front page to the permissions area, which seems a lot of effort for a relatively small gain.
Quote
Also, all these permissions would run through a central permission control(As in would all the permissions be stored in a single area) or would that be also completely up to the mod author?
Um... centrally since it's already partly built and everything I've said has been about extending what's already there?
5740
Plugins / Re: Using permissions in plugins
« on October 24th, 2011, 09:32 AM »
I don't think it would, though that's really the point of this topic.

See, I'm not just talking hypothetically at this point. Firstly, the Chess mod confused me... to see it having a settings page and not discovering the permissions are elsewhere actually stumped me for a moment. (Not any more than that, it wasn't hard for me to figure out that's what I was supposed to do - but it did confuse a lot of users.)

Secondly, I reflected on SimpleDesk. SD's permissions are huge, which is why it has its own dialogue and setup - and it made me realise that instead of being confusing, it actually isn't, because it puts that plugin's permissions with everything else for that plugin.

SMF even does that - check out the calendar settings page. Right there, it puts the permissions into the calendar area, though it is configurable from the main permissions area too. But even there it feels more logical to go to the calendar page to set who can see said calendar....
5741
Off-topic / Re: Doctor Who
« on October 24th, 2011, 09:27 AM »
Cybermen aren't in series 3 or 4, don't show up again until the end of series 5 (and relatively briefly there), they show up for one episode and one cameo appearance in series 6.

I have to admit I wasn't a big fan of 'Dalek' in series 1, and after that they're just irritating generally. Though things get interesting in series 4... :whistle:
5742
Plugins / Re: Using permissions in plugins
« on October 24th, 2011, 09:09 AM »
Quote
That's not what I meant, I didn't mean that it should split out into multiple pages exactly like the mod settings page
No... most mods that extend the mod settings page do so exactly as intended, making it a single page of stuff that's inconsistent and not the logical place to go for settings for anything.
Quote
I meant that it should be divided into such areas each individually accessible via the permissions page and each should show permissions related to only that with one common area for a setting or two.
So, nothing like the mod settings page then :P And that actually makes the problem worse, not better, by making it even harder to get to a plugin's permissions, which is tough enough given that most users do not automatically think to go check out the different parts of the admin panel when a plugin might add things.

This is why I'm debating not making it easy to add permissions directly to the main permissions areas and instead making plugins do it themselves. (For general non-own/any permissions, there's a 'permissions' field type for setupDBSettingsContext.)
5743
Off-topic / Re: Doctor Who
« on October 24th, 2011, 09:03 AM »
Yeah, so are the rest of us, for the exact same reason. 48 years ago when we first saw them, they were scary, now they're just irritating :P Fortunately, while they have a double episode in series 3 and a double episode in series 4 (though that's a good one), they're limited to a single episode and a smaller appearance elsewhere in series 5 and only in a scene or two in series 6! (Though I bet they'll be back in force for series 7. Boo.)
5744
Plugins / Re: Using permissions in plugins
« on October 24th, 2011, 09:00 AM »
Quote
Permissions should split up like the Modification setting page, allow each mod to add it's own and have a common misc. page for everything else.
I'm not a big fan of the modification settings page, never have been. The only thing it solves is the case of mods that add a couple of settings, nothing more - anything more than that and it should be creating its own page in the Plugins block of the ACP.

That does exactly the same thing: a plugin that adds a single permission is going to look out of place, as is a plugin that adds a massive permission area. In both cases, it still doesn't solve the disjoint where users have to go to multiple places to configure things - if a plugin is adding its own area already, it is flat out illogical to have to make users go elsewhere to configure permissions separately.
Quote
Just a question, are you only planning on overhauling the permissions UI or the underlying structure as well?
As I've outlined in several posts, the underlying structure has to change to accommodate larger style plugins anyway.
5745
Off-topic / Re: New coding music :D
« on October 24th, 2011, 01:36 AM »
That's pretty neat for an acoustic guitar, and quite nice as coding backdrop actually :)

Also, I'd come across Eric (from the above poster), in particular his Pirates of the Caribbean meets Metal and Castlevania meets Metal. Links are not hard to find from the video...