This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
556
Off-topic / Re: I don't Like Forum Signatures
« on May 29th, 2013, 09:53 PM »
It is a good thing then that both SMF and Wedge allow you to just disable it without even having to edit anything then, isn't it?
557
Off-topic / Re: System visitations: MyBB 1.6.10
« on May 29th, 2013, 09:08 PM »It's just Google trying to impose their self righteousness on others. Heavy websites like Facebook does not pass the test.
I am posting this because they Mybb fan boys says that mybb consumes less resources than SMF.
As of Elkarte, haven't heard of them, tried to visit the website and got this
- Some webmasters just keep on committing the same 'sin'.
SMF2.1 these looks neat and the navigation is just beauty the only minus is not showing the posts under username in display template.
558
Off-topic / Re: System visitations: MyBB 1.6.10
« on May 29th, 2013, 06:59 PM »
Well, it's not SMF being like that, it's the sites that insist on proper XHTML... which can have SEO issues (and will be just as much of an issue in ANY system)
Of course most mods work on the default theme... they were designed for the default SMF theme, and yes, if a custom theme does something custom it's going to be a problem... this is expected. It's part of the design, to a point.
SMF 2.0 just doesn't offer the functionality to support doing it with hooks, 2.1 isn't a lot better, Elkarte and Wedge are much stronger (especially Wedge) in that department.
2.1's theme, Curve II, isn't actually that nice. I find it quite bland, actually.
Of course most mods work on the default theme... they were designed for the default SMF theme, and yes, if a custom theme does something custom it's going to be a problem... this is expected. It's part of the design, to a point.
SMF 2.0 just doesn't offer the functionality to support doing it with hooks, 2.1 isn't a lot better, Elkarte and Wedge are much stronger (especially Wedge) in that department.
2.1's theme, Curve II, isn't actually that nice. I find it quite bland, actually.
559
Off-topic / Re: System visitations: MyBB 1.6.10
« on May 29th, 2013, 06:39 PM »
So that's a mod problem not a theme problem. It's not a problem with Wedge since mods cannot make any code edits whatsoever. And our plugin system runs faster and more cleanly than what I've seen on MyBB's.
(Did you know we run several plugins on here?)
(Did you know we run several plugins on here?)
560
Off-topic / Re: System visitations: MyBB 1.6.10
« on May 29th, 2013, 06:17 PM »
Well, threaded is gone in 2.0. (Just like it is gone in vB 4 and IPB 3.4)[1]
They're also adding "SEO friendly" (blah) URLs by default and some other stuff that just makes me feel all meh about it.
I get what you mean about premium MyBB themes, but to a point the same is true of SMF, most of the free themes are fairly dull and insipid.
As far as our admin panel is concerned, it is a bit different to SMF's. I actually don't like MyBB's admin panel. It's organised but it's stark, even with the Sharepoint theme and having a huge page for 25 options seems intimidating. I would draw your attention to http://wedge.org/pub/feats/7097/don-t-know-if-i-shared-it-publicly-or-not/ - while it's a picture from last year using the old Wedge default theme (yes, we've been through more than one already, that's Wine as opposed to Weaving), the sentiment is still exactly the same. (I haven't changed it that significantly in the intervening time, though there are more icons and stuff than before)
There is also the thing I mocked up as http://wedge.org/pub/feats/7159/some-admin-menu-changes/msg274290/#msg274290 though it has a few more options in it now IIRC.
As far as resources go, so far Wedge looks like it might be lighter in some respects and heavier in others compared to MyBB, but we're still in active development and changing big things so that may well change.
SMF doesn't have me any more, btw.
What do you mean that 'MyBB handles themes much better than SMF' exactly?
They're also adding "SEO friendly" (blah) URLs by default and some other stuff that just makes me feel all meh about it.
I get what you mean about premium MyBB themes, but to a point the same is true of SMF, most of the free themes are fairly dull and insipid.
As far as our admin panel is concerned, it is a bit different to SMF's. I actually don't like MyBB's admin panel. It's organised but it's stark, even with the Sharepoint theme and having a huge page for 25 options seems intimidating. I would draw your attention to http://wedge.org/pub/feats/7097/don-t-know-if-i-shared-it-publicly-or-not/ - while it's a picture from last year using the old Wedge default theme (yes, we've been through more than one already, that's Wine as opposed to Weaving), the sentiment is still exactly the same. (I haven't changed it that significantly in the intervening time, though there are more icons and stuff than before)
There is also the thing I mocked up as http://wedge.org/pub/feats/7159/some-admin-menu-changes/msg274290/#msg274290 though it has a few more options in it now IIRC.
As far as resources go, so far Wedge looks like it might be lighter in some respects and heavier in others compared to MyBB, but we're still in active development and changing big things so that may well change.
SMF doesn't have me any more, btw.
What do you mean that 'MyBB handles themes much better than SMF' exactly?
| 1. | As an aside, we've talked about adding it in Wedge because it does have a place and a use, but the UI invariably sucks. |
561
Archived fixes / Re: A plugin must declare an action the long way
« on May 29th, 2013, 06:00 PM »
Would a portal really be creating its own *dynamic actions*? I haven't seen any portal do that for SMF. Static actions (action=forum) and pages (page=x), yes, but not dynamically allocated action=item.
And for those rare cases it's going to happen, doing it the long way really is a minor deal, no?
Mind you, I've made it clear that I want to see a CMS of sorts in the core in more recent times, so I'm not really sensing this to be a real world problem ;)
And for those rare cases it's going to happen, doing it the long way really is a minor deal, no?
Mind you, I've made it clear that I want to see a CMS of sorts in the core in more recent times, so I'm not really sensing this to be a real world problem ;)
562
Bug reports / Re: PM Quoting
« on May 29th, 2013, 04:29 PM »
Actually it does make a lot of sense if it's controlled by the board itself rather than anything else - keep privacy at topic level but make everything else board level for presentation.
The biggest hurdle then actually becomes performance management, right now the board access setup is a performance bottleneck if you have too many boards. Need to figure out a way of fixing that.
The biggest hurdle then actually becomes performance management, right now the board access setup is a performance bottleneck if you have too many boards. Need to figure out a way of fixing that.
563
Archived fixes / Re: action_list is called too late
« on May 29th, 2013, 04:17 PM »
Give me a use case for plugins that have to declare their own actions manually...
I probably will fix it anyway but folks should be using the XML interface which is faster since no extra files get loaded.
Have fixed locally, will commit later. There is a small contingent of cases you might need it (e.g. certain kinds of CMS if we don't get to that first...) but it does need to be set up for $context['action']'s benefit.
I probably will fix it anyway but folks should be using the XML interface which is faster since no extra files get loaded.
Posted: May 29th, 2013, 02:49 PM
Have fixed locally, will commit later. There is a small contingent of cases you might need it (e.g. certain kinds of CMS if we don't get to that first...) but it does need to be set up for $context['action']'s benefit.
564
Archived fixes / Re: A plugin must declare an action the long way
« on May 29th, 2013, 04:15 PM »
Um, why aren't you using the XML interface? Just curious.
So I looked at this and realised that by necessity it must do that seeing how it needs all three parameters to be able to get the plugin id. But in almost every case a plugin should be using the XML interface; it should only ever need the hook directly if it's going to dynamically generate actions that aren't pre-known at the point of registering the plugin.
Posted: May 29th, 2013, 02:47 PM
So I looked at this and realised that by necessity it must do that seeing how it needs all three parameters to be able to get the plugin id. But in almost every case a plugin should be using the XML interface; it should only ever need the hook directly if it's going to dynamically generate actions that aren't pre-known at the point of registering the plugin.
565
Plugins / [Plugin] Re: Notifications system (1.0)
« on May 29th, 2013, 03:58 PM »
Yeah, I'm inclined to think overflow:hidden might help but I still think it makes it overly long vertically.
566
Archived fixes / Re: Subject 0 is treated as empty
« on May 29th, 2013, 02:53 PM »
I blame PHP type juggling...
567
Bug reports / Re: PM Quoting
« on May 29th, 2013, 02:50 PM »
Technically it should be controlled by the board type rather than anything else but PMs are special.
568
Off-topic / Re: System visitations: MyBB 1.6.10
« on May 29th, 2013, 03:10 AM »
I'm waiting for the day when someone mouths off that I don't know what I'm talking about. Because you just know it's going to happen.
569
Plugins / [Plugin] Re: Notifications system (1.0)
« on May 29th, 2013, 02:02 AM »
You have to click on the bit that isn't the wording for it to show up... it won't just include the full message of the text straight off...
570
Off-topic / Re: System visitations: MyBB 1.6.10
« on May 29th, 2013, 12:28 AM »
So I've heard. I find it interesting given how the people who claim MyBB's support is lovely are the people who bitch loudest about SMF's.
I can't wait for that when it happens here :niark:
I can't wait for that when it happens here :niark: