This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
4351
Features / Re: The Regular Members group
« on March 15th, 2012, 04:16 PM »
Oh, I see the problem. I'm just not sure how best to fix it.
4352
Features / Re: Multiple default skins?
« on March 15th, 2012, 04:15 PM »You mean, adding a per-skin option like <disable> and <hide>, right...? (disable = not selectable, not usable, only used for inheritance. hide = not selectable, but usable through e.g. default skin selection.)
Except it's very unlikely you'd do that. (There's only the Asus Eeepad Transformer/Transformer Prime that does that on a wider scale, AFAIK. These definitely qualify for full desktop experience to me.)
Well, mobile support is included in our default theme... Considering that it's less than 30 lines of code or so, I don't think it's that big a deal. Do you?
The reason I'm so adamant about mobile support being a theme and not a skin is as indicated the reduction in bandwidth (and, if we're careful, there's no reason why we couldn't trim certain data we're not showing from even being queried in the first place)
4353
Off-topic / Re: How to piss Arantor off, part 2: take the view that he's a negative person
« on March 15th, 2012, 04:12 PM »Terminator/Predator/Total Recall - all great movies
4354
Features / Re: Multiple default skins?
« on March 15th, 2012, 03:36 PM »- Default skin for guests
- Default skin for new members
Until now, easy to grasp... But even easier:
- Default skin for mobile devices
Also: option to disable users picking their own (which is a shade cleaner than having to remove skins)
Hmm yeah that's the thing -- philosophy differences. A mobile device can either be seen as a "device without a mouse or keyboard" (i.e. you need to redo the UI), or a "device with a low resolution"
I do get the impression that the mobile support should be handled less by a skin and more by a theme (bearing in mind that we can fall back to the default)
4355
Features / Re: Pretty URLs things
« on March 15th, 2012, 02:39 PM »
Hmm, seems like the caches may be OK then. It's just one of those things I don't really know that much about, you know?
4356
Features / Re: The Regular Members group
« on March 15th, 2012, 02:35 PM »
The whole Regular Members thing is a massive headache from both a technical and logistical point of view.
A simple band-aid, as suggested by Unknown years ago would be to start off by renaming it to Ungrouped Members. At least then it would be accurate rather than vague and possibly misleading like it is now.
There is no technical reason why we can't add 'Regular Members' to the additional groups, other than the fact it should be completely unnecessary. I'm not arguing that it's broken but I don't think that's the solution.
A simple band-aid, as suggested by Unknown years ago would be to start off by renaming it to Ungrouped Members. At least then it would be accurate rather than vague and possibly misleading like it is now.
There is no technical reason why we can't add 'Regular Members' to the additional groups, other than the fact it should be completely unnecessary. I'm not arguing that it's broken but I don't think that's the solution.
4357
Features / Re: Pretty URLs things
« on March 15th, 2012, 01:28 AM »- Board URLs: I think you're supposed to rename your boards manually. And yes, I guess it'd be nicer to automatically fill in the names based on the board names...
The first board, correctly, has smf/wedge/general as its URL (reflecting the fact this is running on http://smf/wedge/) but the second board only has new-board-1 which is handled as a complete URL, i.e. off site to another domain.
- Topic URLs: yes, the key was updated to lose the uniqueness. The title needs to be cached because generating it is quite expensive (especially if it has special chars in it), and we need to replace topic IDs with topic URLs on the entire page in realtime. So it's really not for determining the ID of the current topic URL, it's the other way around. Did I fail at something..?
Also, is it actually faster to do a query than it is to just do the replacements?
4358
Features / Re: New revs
« on March 15th, 2012, 12:41 AM »
(1 modified, 1KB)
Revision: 1467
Author: arantor
Date: 14 March 2012 23:41:25
Message:
! Sorry Nao, I don't think you'll like this regex change much. But we need to make sure that canonical URLs do not get passed through the PHPSESSID injector, since prior to this, they were - which means PHPSESSIDs galore throughout the web, even with canonical URLs. Yes, SMF has this bug but too many people keep denying its existence without actually bothering to check. (Subs-Template.php)
----
Modified : /trunk/Sources/Subs-Template.php
Revision: 1467
Author: arantor
Date: 14 March 2012 23:41:25
Message:
! Sorry Nao, I don't think you'll like this regex change much. But we need to make sure that canonical URLs do not get passed through the PHPSESSID injector, since prior to this, they were - which means PHPSESSIDs galore throughout the web, even with canonical URLs. Yes, SMF has this bug but too many people keep denying its existence without actually bothering to check. (Subs-Template.php)
----
Modified : /trunk/Sources/Subs-Template.php
4359
Off-topic / Re: How to piss Arantor off, part 2: take the view that he's a negative person
« on March 14th, 2012, 10:08 PM »What's there not to like in Jim Carrey...? The Truman Show, Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, ASOUE, even Dumb & Dumber was a good movie...
He's got a better track record than some actors I can think of, though.
4360
I considered both approaches and concluded that I'd rather have it prominent and visible, but have no objection to moving it to the action menu for wireless.
Given that right now it's the only 'appreciation' / 'thank' / 'karma' type feature we have, it does need *some* prominence.
Given that right now it's the only 'appreciation' / 'thank' / 'karma' type feature we have, it does need *some* prominence.
4361
Off-topic / Re: How to piss Arantor off, part 2: take the view that he's a negative person
« on March 14th, 2012, 09:59 PM »
I didn't like Twins, I thought it a bit stupid (which is quite impressive given that I do like some of Jim Carrey's films), it just struck me that the jokes were written in such a way that they came across as forced even if they weren't intended as such.
I've still never seen Taxi either.
Sadly, most of my DVDs are packed up in boxes right now, but I guess I could find something on iTunes to watch?
I've still never seen Taxi either.
Sadly, most of my DVDs are packed up in boxes right now, but I guess I could find something on iTunes to watch?
4363
Off-topic / Re: How to piss Arantor off, part 2: take the view that he's a negative person
« on March 14th, 2012, 09:14 PM »4364
The Pub / Re: Logo Madness
« on March 14th, 2012, 06:50 PM »
There's a difference between webelow3 and 4? I can't see it...
* Arantor thinks that most people have just looked at this 64 page thread and gone "WTF" by now :P
4365
The Pub / Re: Logo Madness
« on March 14th, 2012, 05:08 PM »
But webelow is structurally what's on the badges so it really should be that! :P