This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
4306
Features / Re: Badges and the displaying thereof
« on March 17th, 2012, 02:53 PM »But I deny with your view that not many sites use badges... So far I have been registered in forums, there is definitely some or the other badges assigned to special members (Staff, premium, etc)
4307
Archived fixes / [Bug] Re: Unable to reply a post
« on March 17th, 2012, 02:52 PM »
Thing is, it's not them. It's presumably the browser making the request? Though why the browser is making such a request I have no idea.
4308
Features / Admin upload facilities
« on March 17th, 2012, 02:51 PM »
OK, since this has been asked, I'm going to explain this in a lot more detail.
The simple version: having any kind of ability where the admin uploads something for the forum itself, e.g. themes, plugins, smiley images, badges/rank images... this is a security risk. So too is media and attachments and avatars, but specific things can be done to mitigate those.
But anything that requires touching any of the core files is a serious security risk. Why? Because it requires opening up the core folders and files to higher permissions than they should have. This means making things writable by ANY USER on a shared host. Can we say 'hackable'? YES WE CAN!
The obvious answer is 'put permissions back again afterwards' but the thing is, people don't. They leave permissions set open for their own convenience later on, which is how come so many SMF installations get hacked at some time or another.[1]
Now, I have proposed a solution for this elsewhere but it's not a brilliant one. Specifically, it would require you (as the admin) to put in your FTP password periodically to upload things like plugins. Certain magic can be worked so that FTP (or SFTP) can be used to perform this kind of work, without making a security hole.
Before anyone asks, what are the chances of me giving you an admin upload facility that doesn't use FTP/SFTP and works solely by you changing permissions yourself? ZERO. There is ABSOLUTELY NO WAY IN HELL I will give you that ability. The idea is that you shouldn't be screwing around with it, and especially not screwing around with setting core files/folders to 777. And if you do, that's YOUR responsibility. My responsibility is in making a decision whether I give you a gun to shoot yourself with, or giving you an air rifle that probably won't kill you, you can guess where I'm going with this.
The simple version: having any kind of ability where the admin uploads something for the forum itself, e.g. themes, plugins, smiley images, badges/rank images... this is a security risk. So too is media and attachments and avatars, but specific things can be done to mitigate those.
But anything that requires touching any of the core files is a serious security risk. Why? Because it requires opening up the core folders and files to higher permissions than they should have. This means making things writable by ANY USER on a shared host. Can we say 'hackable'? YES WE CAN!
The obvious answer is 'put permissions back again afterwards' but the thing is, people don't. They leave permissions set open for their own convenience later on, which is how come so many SMF installations get hacked at some time or another.[1]
Now, I have proposed a solution for this elsewhere but it's not a brilliant one. Specifically, it would require you (as the admin) to put in your FTP password periodically to upload things like plugins. Certain magic can be worked so that FTP (or SFTP) can be used to perform this kind of work, without making a security hole.
Before anyone asks, what are the chances of me giving you an admin upload facility that doesn't use FTP/SFTP and works solely by you changing permissions yourself? ZERO. There is ABSOLUTELY NO WAY IN HELL I will give you that ability. The idea is that you shouldn't be screwing around with it, and especially not screwing around with setting core files/folders to 777. And if you do, that's YOUR responsibility. My responsibility is in making a decision whether I give you a gun to shoot yourself with, or giving you an air rifle that probably won't kill you, you can guess where I'm going with this.
| 1. | Though I stress, it really isn't only SMF, it's just that's what I know for certain. |
4309
Features / [Idea] Re: Badges related
« on March 17th, 2012, 02:44 PM »
Also note that having an admin upload facility is a significant security risk unless I can manage to implement the strange mythical FTP crap that I've been thinking about.
4310
Features / Re: Badges and the displaying thereof
« on March 17th, 2012, 02:42 PM »
That's the thing, I don't know many sites that actually would implement it like that, especially seeing that the implementation would force us to make YOU have badges that are irregular, unusual and hard to make.
Remember: what we implement in the core is not what JUST YOU wants or needs, we have to implement things for everyone to use, and this is too complex for everyone to use as it stands.
Remember: what we implement in the core is not what JUST YOU wants or needs, we have to implement things for everyone to use, and this is too complex for everyone to use as it stands.
4311
The Pub / Improvement to drafts (and posting, actually) I need to do
« on March 17th, 2012, 02:37 PM »
Something I've noticed about drafts that I didn't quite notice before is a slightly complex chain of events that needs cleaning up.
If you type something, then preview it, it does autosave the draft, and it does actually remember that draft - so if you go from quick reply-with-draft through to preview, it won't create a second draft (as it shouldn't), but you won't be able to delete that draft there and then, you'll have to wait until the post is edited and resaved automatically. (Confirmed here just now, I was able to start a post, let it autosave, preview, then noted the behaviour)
I suspect something similar occurs to PMs, too.
I still need to fix the case of editing a draft when the board no longer exists that the draft originally came from.[1]
Also: IMO, the tabindex structure on posting is a touch off, it needs to go from subject to body, not via the selectboxes. I don't think it should take 4 tabs to get from subject to body.
If you type something, then preview it, it does autosave the draft, and it does actually remember that draft - so if you go from quick reply-with-draft through to preview, it won't create a second draft (as it shouldn't), but you won't be able to delete that draft there and then, you'll have to wait until the post is edited and resaved automatically. (Confirmed here just now, I was able to start a post, let it autosave, preview, then noted the behaviour)
I suspect something similar occurs to PMs, too.
I still need to fix the case of editing a draft when the board no longer exists that the draft originally came from.[1]
Also: IMO, the tabindex structure on posting is a touch off, it needs to go from subject to body, not via the selectboxes. I don't think it should take 4 tabs to get from subject to body.
| 1. | If you have a draft for a reply, but the topic no longer exists, that's fine, it will just take you to editing as if you were creating a new topic. But if the board no longer exists, it gets very upset and dumps you at the no_board error. |
4312
Off-topic / Re: One and One Story
« on March 17th, 2012, 02:33 PM »
Apple are actually pretty good about removing clones like that, from what I've seen, even in cases where it's not a huge top-flight developer.
4313
Features / [Idea] Re: Badges related
« on March 17th, 2012, 02:29 PM »
The thing is, this isn't actually a common request to assign badges to everyone, and even if it were, they'd still be using the post count groups to do it anyway...
4314
Features / [Idea] Re: Badges related
« on March 17th, 2012, 02:27 PM »
-sigh-
How about actually reading some of the posts already here? Like the discussion already on having badges where I asked people, multiple times, how they expect to actually configure it?
http://wedge.org/pub/feats/7108/badges-and-the-displaying-thereof/ - it's even in this same board.
How about actually reading some of the posts already here? Like the discussion already on having badges where I asked people, multiple times, how they expect to actually configure it?
http://wedge.org/pub/feats/7108/badges-and-the-displaying-thereof/ - it's even in this same board.
4315
Archived fixes / [Bug] Re: Unable to reply a post
« on March 17th, 2012, 02:24 PM »
That's one of the greatest things that irritates me about Tapatalk.
Anyway, it's curious to see Tapatalk requests being made when it's not even installed here.
Anyway, it's curious to see Tapatalk requests being made when it's not even installed here.
4316
Features / Re: New revs
« on March 17th, 2012, 02:23 PM »
(1 file, 3KB)
Revision: 1478
Author: arantor
Date: 17 March 2012 13:22:54
Message:
! Rewrite the IPv6 matching code, it should now work properly on addresses (as it actually predates the IPv6 implementation, it didn't actually match netblocks properly against the internal IPv6 encoding used.) (Subs.php)
----
Modified : /trunk/Sources/Subs.php
Revision: 1478
Author: arantor
Date: 17 March 2012 13:22:54
Message:
! Rewrite the IPv6 matching code, it should now work properly on addresses (as it actually predates the IPv6 implementation, it didn't actually match netblocks properly against the internal IPv6 encoding used.) (Subs.php)
----
Modified : /trunk/Sources/Subs.php
4317
Archived fixes / [Bug] Re: Unable to reply a post
« on March 17th, 2012, 01:32 PM »
I don't think so, it's specific to Tapatalk, and all communities accessible via Tapatalk have to be manually added to their DB (and it's not there now), so I have no idea, as Tapatalk has never been installed here to the best of my knowledge.
4318
Off-topic / Re: One and One Story
« on March 17th, 2012, 01:03 PM »
That's actually a beautifully designed game. The way the game mechanics change depending on circumstance is actually ingenious.
4319
Features / Re: Brave new world
« on March 17th, 2012, 12:58 PM »All software is up to date (Windows, Java, Flash etc). And befor I forget, I am using Eset AV 5.
I had no problems with slow Post Reply when Wedge.org was running SMF, nor did, or do I have problems with slow Post Reply with any SMF forum.
Also note that our quick reply editor isn't really a true quick reply editor any more ;)
4320
Off-topic / Re: I'm in love all over again
« on March 17th, 2012, 12:57 PM »
Nao's the real hero here, he's the one who made it look so awesome :)