Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Arantor
4081
Features / Re: Recent Posts / Ignore Boards
« on March 25th, 2012, 10:21 PM »
You can pretty much ask the should-it-respect-ignore for almost every query that touches boards.
One thing I will note is that some people would actually prefer ignored boards to be hidden entirely.
Also, that does tell me that some of the work thus far on cleaning up UI has also been working out (though the profile is not one area we've done much with yet)
One thing I will note is that some people would actually prefer ignored boards to be hidden entirely.
Also, that does tell me that some of the work thus far on cleaning up UI has also been working out (though the profile is not one area we've done much with yet)
4082
Archived fixes / Re: Time offset (auto detect)
« on March 25th, 2012, 10:20 PM »
And since the user profile area does not have timezone configuration (even though it's supported internally), that would presume the server is appropriately configured and uses a timezone setting that is equivalent to Europe/London.
4083
Archived fixes / Re: Time offset (auto detect)
« on March 25th, 2012, 10:06 PM »
Is your computer clock correct, though? That particular code hasn't been changed, and it works by comparing server time with local time.
Interestingly, mine is correct here though I have not touched anything... :/
Interestingly, mine is correct here though I have not touched anything... :/
4084
Features / Re: Recent Posts / Ignore Boards
« on March 25th, 2012, 10:04 PM »
I find it amazing how many features are actually SMF features that no-one really know they were there. This is one such case.
There is a big question over some places as to whether it should apply or not. The homepage, yes, should apply it, but other places do not have to, like SSI generally.
Places that do use query_wanna_see_board, places that don't merely use query_see_board.
There is a big question over some places as to whether it should apply or not. The homepage, yes, should apply it, but other places do not have to, like SSI generally.
Places that do use query_wanna_see_board, places that don't merely use query_see_board.
4086
Archived fixes / Re: IE8: menu broken (with fix)
« on March 25th, 2012, 05:44 PM »
You got redirected to a /new/#new page, that's got an anchor in it...?
4087
Archived fixes / Re: IE8: menu broken (with fix)
« on March 25th, 2012, 05:03 PM »
Well, there is a specific branch for redirectexit just for IE, which is primarily related to whether the URL has # in it or not...
4088
Archived fixes / Re: IE8: menu broken (with fix)
« on March 25th, 2012, 02:25 PM »
Is that also why there was a modestly high profile piece at the time reporting that Windows 95 was still in use in certain places - even in 2009-10?
4089
Archived fixes / Re: IE8: menu broken (with fix)
« on March 25th, 2012, 12:43 PM »
Is that why it took months to get Conflickr infected machines cleaned up? ;)
4090
Archived fixes / Re: Smart Tag Closer
« on March 25th, 2012, 01:03 AM »
It is still done in parse_bbc as well last I remember, on the assumption that tags may be mismatched, especially code or quote tags.
But we can mostly assume tags are closed on Wedge created content (but not for imported content)
But we can mostly assume tags are closed on Wedge created content (but not for imported content)
4091
Archived fixes / Re: Smart Tag Closer
« on March 24th, 2012, 11:30 PM »
You rewrote it, remember, so it validates that tag matches are correct?
4092
Archived fixes / Re: Smart Tag Closer
« on March 24th, 2012, 10:32 PM »
I suppose it should be done at post time now, especially given that the post is validated for tag matches.
I'd personally allow for a-zA-Z0-9, but simple alphabetic would be safe enough.
I'd personally allow for a-zA-Z0-9, but simple alphabetic would be safe enough.
4093
Archived fixes / Re: Smart Tag Closer
« on March 24th, 2012, 06:35 PM »
Not at post time, no. It's actually done at parse time for most tags, with only massive-layout-breaking ones done at preparse.
Also, just noticed it gets confused if you happen to have a quote with something like $_REQUEST['start'] in it as it tries to make a closing [/'start'] tag, but ['start'] should be overridden somewhere in parsing to prevent it being considered for parsing.
Posted: March 24th, 2012, 06:17 PM
Also, just noticed it gets confused if you happen to have a quote with something like $_REQUEST['start'] in it as it tries to make a closing [/'start'] tag, but ['start'] should be overridden somewhere in parsing to prevent it being considered for parsing.
4094
Archived fixes / Re: IE8: menu broken (with fix)
« on March 24th, 2012, 06:27 PM »
Paint comes with Windows itself :/ Failing that, print screen and paste into Word...
4095
The draft code should at least preparse, though, right? As far as I remember, it should htmlspecialchars and preparsecode, like the post code flow, which would handle the quot conversion.
I will, once I get everything set up, investigate this thoroughly - but I still don't remember even SMF doing addslashes anywhere, because there is absolutely no reason for it to do so.
I will, once I get everything set up, investigate this thoroughly - but I still don't remember even SMF doing addslashes anywhere, because there is absolutely no reason for it to do so.