Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Arantor
3271
Off-topic / Re: Help with apache2
« on June 1st, 2012, 02:28 AM »
Yup, you just point all the records at the server and let the HTTP request indicate which one it wants.

You don't need to change /etc/host.conf (I think you mean /etc/hosts), you just need to make sure whatever you're using for external DNS points to the right server, and that each of your virtual hosts has the proper ServerName defined like yours does.

What happens is that each request will come in with the Host header set as part of the request, Apache will look through all the name based virtual hosts for any server whose ServerName matches the Host header as indicated, and will work with that one if it's matched.

If no matches are found, I forget exactly what Apache does but I believe it goes to the last one defined as a fallback.


(Interesting: the link still gets processed even inside a code tag >_<)
3272
Features / Re: Shole's List
« on June 1st, 2012, 02:18 AM »
*nods* Take the feature I'm working on: making the anti-spam questions support multiple languages and multiple answers per question instead of one language, one answer per question... so far I'm up to about 10 hours and counting for what is theoretically a tiny feature.
3273
Off-topic / Re: Help with apache2
« on June 1st, 2012, 02:15 AM »
Yup. All the virtual hosts are defined as being * but without any port designation, while you clearly state that Named Virtual Hosts should use *:80 in ports.conf.

(And yes, this is Apache 2, httpd.conf is deprecated in favour of apache2.conf and lots of sub configuration files)

It actually shouldn't matter, Apache is bound to port 80 through the Listen directive so it should just be a case of Apache complaining but still actually serving files correctly.
3274
Features / Re: Shole's List
« on June 1st, 2012, 01:52 AM »
Oh, I know that feeling too, having actually written a novel in the past, heh. But yes, it's certainly true and you'd be surprised how many people don't actually realise that's the case.
3275
Features / Re: Shole's List
« on June 1st, 2012, 01:43 AM »
The one thing I do need to remind people is that it's all wonderful coming up with fantastic ideas but that someone ultimately has to make them, and I guarantee it takes a lot more time and effort to make it than it does to come up with the idea ;)

Just implementing this list is probably several weeks' worth of work.
3276
Features / Re: Shole's List
« on June 1st, 2012, 01:33 AM »
That's also a massive task to actually perform in terms of art assets (having looked at it before), again it's plugin material, though I know exactly how I'd do it if I had the art assets handy.
3277
Features / Re: Shole's List
« on June 1st, 2012, 01:22 AM »
Well, I originally wanted to remove it and make it a plugin but others disagreed with me, haha. My view on such things is that things being made plugins means I can work on them and develop them individually without having to worry about waiting for another main-line release date. I already removed SMF's calendar and made it a plugin.
3278
Features / Re: Shole's List
« on June 1st, 2012, 01:15 AM »
Some interesting ideas, there, thanks for sharing!

Let me explain one thing up front about our plugin system. It is designed with two things in mind: 1) No file edits, at all, are possible with the plugin system. 2) It's designed less about specific versions and more about features, meaning that plugins should be able to work across versions by detecting what facilities are available. Certainly that's been true for the last 6 months since we implemented it.


1. I'm not sure thread prefixes are really necessary in the core, to be honest. While I've seen it as a core feature in XenForo, and I've even made use of it there, it isn't something I've seen on most forums. However, it would make a great plugin, and I've certainly thought about it for here in the past. What it might be worth doing is implementing it as a plugin and seeing how much use it gets there.

2. It might be used in every promotion forum, but I guarantee you that's a tiny fraction of the forums out there. Certainly a points plugin is on my to-do list because I'm just not convinced it needs to be there by default for every forum. Remember: it's not just promotion forums out there, there are many, many, many kinds of forum, and remember that everything that's in the core has to be maintained by us and it does mean it makes it slower for everyone that doesn't need it.[1]

3. I really can't see this being in the core. Knowing as I do how many people have trouble with these on shared hosting, I'd avoid it for the most part. There *is* a sort of chat facility of sorts with the 'Thoughts' system as evidenced here (this is not a plugin) but it's not auto-refreshing, which is where it clashes with shared hosting. Live chat is also very often good at *discouraging* posts.

4. What does 'look amazing' mean? That's the problem we have to deal with - I've never really seen a 'great' profile page, very often it's pretty bare and the people who do want it to be more 'pretty' are those who want to clutter it up with stuff. Generally I find that complex profile pages discourage people from actually posting if they're spending a lot of time in the profile area instead of posting... but it invariably ends up being a high-demand low-real-use thing.

5. As you say yourself it's a niche facility. But it's certainly one we can put as a plugin.

6. Yes, yes it is needed. How often do people leave themselves logged into the likes of Facebook? There are also performance aspects to it, too.

7. That's built in. It's just off by default because it's really annoying. I did look at rewriting it a while ago, just never finished it.

8. There's a good reason you've never seen it as a built in option. In fact, there's several reasons why you've never seen it built in, and to sum those up, we have performance, security and ease of use, which are all affected by having it a core feature. Great plugin material however.

9. Well, a member's list is built in, even if I once wanted to rip it out entirely. Making it look prettier to include avatars is no big deal, though.

10. That's built in. I just don't think it's the default. Try it from your PM area.
 1. This is the sort of thing we have to consider when we're doing things.
3279
Sleep well ;)

It's not just a case of going to France, as such, though. It's that I've had almost no reason in the last 12 years to use French and I've probably forgotten most of it. If I really had to dig, I could probably hash something together but I'd not be able to keep up with people speaking in fluent French.

@films, wrong on all counts.
3280
It was certainly the hardest part for me to make the mental leap from English to French when I studied it to cope with the fact that the majority of terms suddenly had gender to them; in English, the only items that have a gender are done so anthropomorphically - ships, for example where they are referred to as female, correlated to 'You treat her like a lady. And she'll always bring you home.'[1]

Then after a year of studying French, Spanish was also thrust upon me. Fortunately there's a lot of similarity in the languages - including the genders - so I didn't totally fail both, but I dropped Spanish as soon as I had the opportunity and concentrated on the you-will-study-one-foreign-language choice I was actually going to study. The sad part is that although I passed French GCSE in 2000, I haven't been back to France since then :/
 1. Now, anyone that can name where I got that quote without Google or IMDb wins a free internet.
3281
Archived fixes / Re: Thought autofocus
« on May 31st, 2012, 11:26 PM »
Um, both edit and reply give me the proper autofocus?

Sure you're not thinking of something else?
3282
Heh, yes, it should, but for the purpose for which I needed it, 'le' was fine :P When I commit this and you update, you can do it properly here ;)
3283
Of course it doesn't look right, but that's sort of the point, it's not supposed to. It's supposed to be different enough that I can tell at a glance which pool it's drawing from and so that I can ensure it adequately handles randomisation where it's supposed to show one question from two (when using English)

Honestly, this is the fun bit I'm up to now, rewriting the logic of the create-validation routine, one of the areas I know least from SMF, even though I successfully added hooks and an internalised validation method... *facepalm*
3284
Archived fixes / Re: PM's say 2 responses.
« on May 31st, 2012, 10:42 PM »
I think that's the basis for it, however it's not two replies, it's one reply.
3285
The Pub / Re: The Cookie Law (in the UK at least)
« on May 31st, 2012, 10:41 PM »
I hope you can see where our position at the time was, though - that was the summer after the SMF project nearly imploded, that Wedge started, and then vbgamer ripped me off and publicly called me a liar... we were very wary of being taken advantage of, and we still are, really... (it's why Wedge still has the same basic licence as SMF 1.1.x and the reason we're not allowed to publicly discuss much about Wedge at sm.org)