Is there an equivalent function in jQuery that does the same thing as className other than attr()?
A confident man keeps quiet.whereas a frightened man keeps talking, hiding his fear.
live627
-
-
- Should five per cent appear too small / Be thankful I don't take it all / 'Cause I'm the taxman, yeah I'm the taxman
- Posts: 1,670
Nao
- Dadman with a boy
-
-
- Posts: 16,082
You mean .hasClass('class')...?
Or simply .is('.class')? (A bit slower though.)
If you want to assign a class, use .addClass('class') or .toggleClass('class'). The opposite is .removeClass('class').
If you want to get a list of all classes, you'll have to rely on $()[0].className or $().attr('class'), AFAIK.
Or simply .is('.class')? (A bit slower though.)
If you want to assign a class, use .addClass('class') or .toggleClass('class'). The opposite is .removeClass('class').
If you want to get a list of all classes, you'll have to rely on $()[0].className or $().attr('class'), AFAIK.
live627
-
-
- Should five per cent appear too small / Be thankful I don't take it all / 'Cause I'm the taxman, yeah I'm the taxman
- Posts: 1,670
Hmm... okay. So there's no hidden magic function that I missed. Thanks anyway, Nao!
Nao
- Dadman with a boy
-
-
- Posts: 16,082
Well, there's nothing wrong is using className (or anything purely JS) even when jQuery equivalents are available. I usually choose to use jQ in these situations because the code is shorter and thus compresses better.
Speaking of which, I just finished rewriting Zoomedia... The code works much better, and is about 150 bytes shorter :D
Speaking of which, I just finished rewriting Zoomedia... The code works much better, and is about 150 bytes shorter :D
live627
-
-
- Should five per cent appear too small / Be thankful I don't take it all / 'Cause I'm the taxman, yeah I'm the taxman
- Posts: 1,670