I find it very interesting. Honestly, I wish I had the time to sink my teeth into something like this. These are some good improvements, and if things like this are getting rejected, I wonder how much good a fork could do in the world...Quote from Arantor on June 16th, 2011, 01:26 PM Yes, although annoying, I agree.Quote from Arantor on June 17th, 2011, 05:12 PM This is called jsonp and has problems with > 4k of data. Some of the "easy" things jQuery does don't necessarily encourage best practice (I know this from having to do code review at work.)Quote from Eros on June 18th, 2011, 02:37 AM
Forcing users to use GET and POST, rather than an ambiguous source is a nice step, though honestly I'd love to see a proper taint detection method such as in Perl, where you explicitly can't do anything to input without some kind of sanity check first.
I don't know which off the top of my head, but if it works how I think it works, it'll be GET - because what it can do is inject a <script> tag into the DOM for the browser to fetch the contents dynamically - and it'll be JSON when it comes in, presumably.
....I wouldn't call the POS IDEs for PHP proper IDE's either. Then again, the only thing I think Microsoft ever did right was Visual Studio so....:/
/quote]
Indeed. I use Phalanger myself for PHP and it works great. I bet it could be hacked relatively easily into supporting a JSON-like array syntax.
-[Unknown]