Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - ziycon
76
Archived fixes / Re: Wireless Theme Image Bug
« on April 22nd, 2013, 12:06 PM »
Your correct in what your saying, firefox handles empty image tags nicely whereas most other browsers don't.
77
Test board / Test
« on April 22nd, 2013, 11:54 AM »
test post
test
test again
Posted: April 22nd, 2013, 11:51 AM
test
Posted: April 22nd, 2013, 11:52 AM
test again
78
Archived fixes / Wireless Theme Image Bug
« on April 22nd, 2013, 10:36 AM »
On the wireless theme there is a broken image icon showing up on mobile devices relating to the empty image tag below that has the classes 'opaque' and 'avatar' associated to it. The broken image icon doesn't show up on any browsers I've used on the PC.
Code: [Select]
Code: [Select]
<section>
<header class="title">
<span class="greeting">Hello, <span>ziycon</span>!</span>
</header>
<div id="userbox">
<img src="" class="opaque avatar">
<ul>
<li><a href="/do/unread/">Unread posts</a></li>
<li><a href="/do/unreadreplies/">Unread replies</a></li>
</ul>
<p class="now">April 22nd, 2013, 09:31 AM</p>
</div>
</section>#userbox img.avatar {
float: right;
margin: 0 0.2em 0 1em;
max-width: 70px;
padding: 0;
}
img.opaque {
border-radius: 6px 6px 6px 6px;
box-shadow: 1px 1px 3px #776666;
}79
Bug reports / Re: Posting / New Posts
« on April 21st, 2013, 11:37 PM »
Ah so its been seen before :)
I'm just using the default settings when posting, nothing special, I'll keep an eye out for it and let you know if I see anything odd.
I'm just using the default settings when posting, nothing special, I'll keep an eye out for it and let you know if I see anything odd.
80
Bug reports / Posting / New Posts
« on April 21st, 2013, 10:22 PM »
Sorry about all the posts, just little things I'm seeing, not sure if it has already been reported.
I've posted a good few posts but every now and then I'll post a new topic or post and submit it grand then when I go back to the home page of wedge the board will show as if there's an unread post and then if I go into the board my new post or topic is showing up as unread.
My understanding is that any of my own posts or topics shouldn't show up to myself as new or unread.
It's a bit hard to replicate as it seems random and I don't want to spam the site with useless posts to replicate it and get a screen grab for you.
I've posted a good few posts but every now and then I'll post a new topic or post and submit it grand then when I go back to the home page of wedge the board will show as if there's an unread post and then if I go into the board my new post or topic is showing up as unread.
My understanding is that any of my own posts or topics shouldn't show up to myself as new or unread.
It's a bit hard to replicate as it seems random and I don't want to spam the site with useless posts to replicate it and get a screen grab for you.
81
The Pub / Ajax Page Load
« on April 21st, 2013, 10:18 PM »
Just wondering if you've noticed the ajax loading used around wedge, seems to be the default one used in SMF, an example is when your posting and click preview at the top of the page it shows as the white bar with the orange line.
Would be nice to see maybe a very light grey with a very small bit of opacity with a loading gif for the ajax loads or something along those lines.
Would be nice to see maybe a very light grey with a very small bit of opacity with a loading gif for the ajax loads or something along those lines.
82
Archived fixes / Moving 'new thought' out of the sidebar?
« on April 21st, 2013, 10:14 PM »
Just wondering if this is expected functionality, when a user has been deleted should the thought not still show the username from whoever posted the thought and just not link to the user's profile?
See attached file.
:edit: by Nao: original topic was called 'Thoughts Deleted Users!?', but since it quickly moved to another discussion... I've taken the liberty of renaming it, I hope you won't mind..!
See attached file.
:edit: by Nao: original topic was called 'Thoughts Deleted Users!?', but since it quickly moved to another discussion... I've taken the liberty of renaming it, I hope you won't mind..!
83
Archived fixes / Re: Member recount
« on April 20th, 2013, 08:21 PM »How so..? UPDATE {db_prefix}members SET posts = 0. That's it... A single query for ALL members.
Well, yes we could also store the original count, and only update if it's different (not higher...), that's for sure.
Or you could use a single query to update all users similar to the below query.It'd be slightly more complex than this one, but generally speaking, I'd avoid using subselects because they're rarely faster than multiple well-optimized queries.Code: [Select] UPDATE {user_table}
SET {post_count}=(
SELECT COUNT({post_id})
FROM {post_table}
WHERE {user_id_field}={user_id}
)
WHERE {user_id_field}={user_id};
84
Archived fixes / Re: Member recount
« on April 20th, 2013, 07:23 PM »
I wouldn't use the first option as you will end up executing two update statements for each user which is a slight bit more cpu intensive then a single query unless you have a reason for running two queries.
The second option seems better, count all posts based on user ID into an array and then run an update statement when the value in the array is greater then the value in the user post count filed.
Or you could use a single query to update all users similar to the below query.
Code: [Select]
The second option seems better, count all posts based on user ID into an array and then run an update statement when the value in the array is greater then the value in the user post count filed.
Or you could use a single query to update all users similar to the below query.
UPDATE {user_table}
SET {post_count}=(
SELECT COUNT({post_id})
FROM {post_table}
WHERE {user_id_field}={user_id}
)
WHERE {user_id_field}={user_id};85
Features / Re: Choosing useless images to remove...
« on April 20th, 2013, 07:13 PM »
The less icons the better, I know such a small icon wouldn't have very much if any performance impact. But for example in Ireland we have a terrible broadband penetration outside of main cities and I know of quite a lot of people still on dial-up connections that enter a url and click enter and go off and get a cup of tea while they wait for the page to load. Even the odd image here and there can add up and benefit dial-up users.
On a personal side, I feel that a site/app can look and feel just as good if not better with as few images as possible once designed correctly. I actually hate images being used as links now. You can do a lot of nice stuff now-a-days with CSS3 and jQuery which sorted negates the need for images as links, with that said there will always be exceptions.
On a personal side, I feel that a site/app can look and feel just as good if not better with as few images as possible once designed correctly. I actually hate images being used as links now. You can do a lot of nice stuff now-a-days with CSS3 and jQuery which sorted negates the need for images as links, with that said there will always be exceptions.
86
Features / Re: Moderation Centre overhaul
« on April 20th, 2013, 07:06 PM »Guilty.
I was one of the people downloading infractions_wip.zip
I thought it contained a screenshot or something like that.
87
Archived fixes / Re: IE 6/7 + mini-menus = headache
« on April 19th, 2013, 05:21 PM »
Something to keep in mind is that IE6 has less then 1% market share and IE7 has between 6-9% market share depending which source you use. From April next year XP is no longer supported so I can foresee a major drop in the usage of IE8 and below due to the fact that Windows 7 only supports IE9+.
If you take this into consideration with the release date you have in mind for wedge(if you've even thought about a release date yet) you can make a much better informed decision as to whether or not you'll even need to support IE8 and below for the release of wedge.
If you take this into consideration with the release date you have in mind for wedge(if you've even thought about a release date yet) you can make a much better informed decision as to whether or not you'll even need to support IE8 and below for the release of wedge.
88
Features / Re: Session Managment
« on April 18th, 2013, 04:08 PM »
I get what you mean about a comprimised account user account, that actually brings to mind the way facebook deal with logins from outside the 'usual' ip range or country where you are challenged with questions to prove its your account.
Possible a mash up of the two could be used to stop an unauthorised user kill vaild sessions.
Possible a mash up of the two could be used to stop an unauthorised user kill vaild sessions.
89
Features / Re: Session Managment
« on April 18th, 2013, 03:55 PM »
Like i said it was only a suggestion. If you feel it wouldnt be of any benefit thats grand.
I was coming from the point if view were an admin can view all active sessions on a per user basis, not every session at once and allow an admin to kill the session if needed to for whatever reason.
I could have put more detail in, im coming from the way google allows a user to manage theie own sessions and can kill a session were they see activity or a login that wasnt them.
Hope thats a bit clearer.
I was coming from the point if view were an admin can view all active sessions on a per user basis, not every session at once and allow an admin to kill the session if needed to for whatever reason.
I could have put more detail in, im coming from the way google allows a user to manage theie own sessions and can kill a session were they see activity or a login that wasnt them.
Hope thats a bit clearer.
90
Features / Session Managment
« on April 18th, 2013, 11:53 AM »
Not sure if it's been talked about but would you consider a session management feature which would allow an admin to kill of user sessions through the interface instead of having to go into the database or where ever the sessions are maintain for the life of the session?
It would allow for more transparency for admins in allowing them to see the session, the associated user, when the session was created, when the user was last seen with that session etc.
It could also allow you to kill a particular session if there is an issue with a user logging in. It would be useful for some troubleshooting issues I've come across in the past.
Just an idea I would think could be beneficial, no worries if you disagree.
It would allow for more transparency for admins in allowing them to see the session, the associated user, when the session was created, when the user was last seen with that session etc.
It could also allow you to kill a particular session if there is an issue with a user logging in. It would be useful for some troubleshooting issues I've come across in the past.
Just an idea I would think could be beneficial, no worries if you disagree.