tag:wedge.org,2012-03-16:recentWedge - Features: Miscellaneous2024-03-19T08:53:38ZLive information from Wedge
Wedge
WedgeRe: Contact lists Profile privacy is implemented. Have fun. Please send any praise, constructive criticism and suggestions!]]>Naohttps://wedge.org/profile/Nao/2014-08-16T23:00:09Z2014-08-16T23:00:09Ztag:wedge.org,2014-08-16:msg-296249Re: Cool stats!Naohttps://wedge.org/profile/Nao/2014-08-15T15:13:41Z2014-08-15T15:13:41Ztag:wedge.org,2014-08-15:msg-296242Re: Cool stats!Quote from Nao on December 4th, 2013, 12:16 AM
Yes, they're disabled in wedge.org, because they obviously add one DB hit per page, and I thought Google Analytics would be more accurate anyway.[1] The latest update (not live here, though!) actually accounts for disabled items. Only 'hits' for now, but in the end, could add more stuff. Hits are usually not even shown at all, but they used to be enabled, so the old stats (< 2012) still have hits in them. You can look at them, if you want...
It took me years to add Analytics, though... I figured, no need to force a small script to load for everyone, if I'm never looking at these stats. I only installed it because I wanted to know the IE market share here. Still less than 5%, all versions included. Lulz.
Forgot about that when I went from SMF to Wedge. Stupid question : how can I integrate Google Analytics in Wedge ? Thanks !]]>Kianhttps://wedge.org/profile/Kianouch/2014-08-07T15:22:08Z2014-08-07T15:22:08Ztag:wedge.org,2014-08-07:msg-296228Re: Contact listsQuote
Regarding the database tables, I'll probably remove the 'is_synchronous' bit, because you won't need to get contact synchronicity status anywhere outside of the contact list page, and it's easily retrieved with a query anyway...
Full ACK!
Quote
Also, thinking of adding a 'position' index, but for this I guess I'll need your opinion on whether it's of any use. There's unlikely to be many people for each list, so, well, maybe it could even be sorted through PHP...
It's useless. The best way to display list members is to list them in alphabetical order.
Quote
Also, I just noticed that contact_lists also have a 'position' field... Hell. It's not implemented in the current version, and I don't know if it's going to be very useful. I don't know, what do you think..? Do we need to be able to reorder lists, as opposed to list members?
There's no need for it.... with one exception: If you're planning a stream of news regarding from each of your lists, this could help sorting the real stuff from it. But since there's no function... drop it for the moment!]]>Pandoshttps://wedge.org/profile/Pandos/2014-07-06T17:48:50Z2014-07-06T17:48:50Ztag:wedge.org,2014-07-06:msg-296178Re: Contact lists;)
Regarding the database tables, I'll probably remove the 'is_synchronous' bit, because you won't need to get contact synchronicity status anywhere outside of the contact list page, and it's easily retrieved with a query anyway...
Also, thinking of adding a 'position' index, but for this I guess I'll need your opinion on whether it's of any use. There's unlikely to be many people for each list, so, well, maybe it could even be sorted through PHP... :^^;:
I've committed all of my WIP, so you can look into these things. I'll probably be doing more work later.
Also, I just noticed that contact_lists also have a 'position' field... Hell. It's not implemented in the current version, and I don't know if it's going to be very useful. I don't know, what do you think..? Do we need to be able to reorder lists, as opposed to list members?